ReviewComputer standards & interfaces2020
Customer relationship management systems (CRMS) in the healthcare environment: A systematic literature review.
Review in Computer standards & interfaces, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessment and Evaluation of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Student Performance.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Orchestrating the Development of a Sustainable Network IT Solution for a Research Network: Qualitative Participatory Multimethod Design.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Revolutionizing Hemodialysis Care: How Customer Relationship Management Innovation Enhances Patient-Centered Care and Quality of Life.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2026Article
- The Impact of Environmental Quality Dimensions and Green Practices on Patient Satisfaction from Students' Perspective-Managerial and Financial Implications.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The paradox of aging population and firm digital transformation in China.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Navigating the Digital Landscape: Embracing Innovation, Addressing Challenges, and Prioritizing Patient-Centric Care.Cureus · 2024Review
- Article
- Evolution of customer relationship management to data mining-based customer relationship management: a scientometric analysis.Quality & quantity · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of Using Augmented Reality for Training in the Medical Professions: Meta-analysis.JMIR serious games · 2022Article
- Exploration of the usability quality attributes of mobile government services: a literature review.PeerJ. Computer science · 2022Article
- Workflow Automation for a Virtual Hypertension Management Program.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
- Designing a model for patient relationship management in the general hospitals using the combination of analytic hierarchy process and interpretive structural modeling.Journal of education and health promotion · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Customer relationship management (CRM) is an innovative technology that seeks to improve customer satisfaction, loyalty, and profitability by acquiring, developing, and maintaining effective customer relationships and interactions with stakeholders. Numerous researches on CRM have made significant progress in several areas such as telecommunications, banking, and manufacturing, but research specific to the healthcare environment is very limited. This systematic review aims to categorise, summarise, synthesise, and appraise the research on CRM in the healthcare environment, considering the absence of coherent and comprehensive scholarship of disparate data on CRM. Various databases were used to conduct a comprehensive search of studies that examine CRM in the healthcare environment (including hospitals, clinics, medical centres, and nursing homes). Analysis and evaluation of 19 carefully selected studies revealed three main research categories: (i) social CRM 'eCRM'; (ii) implementing CRMS; and (iii) adopting CRMS; with positive outcomes for CRM both in terms of patients relationship/communication with hospital, satisfaction, medical treatment/outcomes and empowerment and hospitals medical operation, productivity, cost, performance, efficiency and service quality. This is the first systematic review to comprehensively synthesise and summarise empirical evidence from disparate CRM research data (quantitative, qualitative, and mixed) in the healthcare environment. Our results revealed that substantial gaps exist in the knowledge of using CRM in the healthcare environment. Future research should focus on exploring: (i) other potential factors, such as patient characteristics, culture (of both the patient and hospital), knowledge management, trust, security, and privacy for implementing and adopting CRMS and (ii) other CRM categories, such as mobile CRM (mCRM) and data mining CRM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.