Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34170946›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Development of an intervention to improve access to living-donor kidney transplantation (the ASK study).

Pippa K Bailey, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Fergus J Caskey, Mohammed Al-Talib, Hannah Lyons, Adarsh Babu, Liise K Kayler, Lucy E Selman

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Decisional Needs of People From Minority Ethnic Groups Around Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A UK Healthcare Professionals' Perspective.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Pippa K BaileyBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2323-1082
Yoav Ben-ShlomoBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Fergus J CaskeyBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Mohammed Al-TalibBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Hannah LyonsBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Adarsh BabuGloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, United Kingdom.
Liise K KaylerErie County Medical Center, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.
Lucy E SelmanBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
North Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBErie County Medical Center · USGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 214554/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A living-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) is one of the best treatments for kidney failure. The UK's LDKT activity falls behind that of many other countries, and there is evidence of socioeconomic inequity in access. We aimed to develop a UK-specific multicomponent intervention to support eligible individuals to access a LDKT. The intervention was designed to support those who are socioeconomically-deprived and currently disadvantaged, by targeting mediators of inequity identified in earlier work. We identified three existing interventions in the literature which target these mediators: a) the Norway model (healthcare practitioners contact patients' family with information about kidney donation), b) a home education model, and c) a Transplant candidate advocate model. We undertook intervention development using the Person-Based Approach (PBA). We performed in-depth qualitative interviews with people with advanced kidney disease (n = 13), their family members (n = 4), and renal and transplant healthcare practitioners (n = 15), analysed using thematic analysis. We investigated participant views on each proposed intervention component. We drafted intervention resources and revised these in light of comments from qualitative 'think-aloud' interviews. Four general themes were identified: i) Perceived cultural and societal norms; ii) Influence of family on decision-making; iii) Resource limitation, and iv) Evidence of effectiveness. For each intervention discussed, we identified three themes: for the Norway model: i) Overcoming communication barriers and assumptions; ii) Request from an official third party, and iii) Risk of coercion; for the home education model: i) Intragroup dynamics; ii) Avoidance of hospital, and iii) Burdens on participants; and for the transplant candidate advocates model: i) Vested interest of advocates; ii) Time commitment, and iii) Risk of misinformation. We used these results to develop a multicomponent intervention which comprises components from existing interventions that have been adapted to increase acceptability and engagement in a UK population. This will be evaluated in a future randomised controlled trial.

Indexed as

Donor SelectionHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeKidney TransplantationLiving DonorsTissue and Organ ProcurementAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID34170946
PMCPMC8232417
OpenAlexW3177190867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.