Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34170940›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Predictors of students' participation in a learning environment survey with annual follow-ups.

Elaina DaLomba, Astrid Gramstad, Susanne G Johnson, Tove Carstensen, Linda Stigen, Gry Mørk, Trine A Magne, Tore Bonsaksen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elaina DaLombaOccupational Therapy Department, Samuel Merritt University, Oakland, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9993-5081
Astrid GramstadFaculty of Health Science, Department of Health and Care Sciences, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2301-5067
Susanne G JohnsonDepartment of Health and Social Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Tove CarstensenDepartment of Neuroscience and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Linda StigenDepartment of Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Gjøvik, Norway.
Gry MørkFaculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Sandnes, Norway.
Trine A MagneDepartment of Neuroscience and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2063-6009
Tore BonsaksenFaculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Sandnes, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6315-1111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLongitudinal research is one effective way to gauge changes in a student cohort over time, however attrition in these studies is typically high, which can result in study bias. This study explored learning environment factors, approaches to studying, and academic performance as predictors of occupational therapy students' consistent participation in data collection conducted over three years of their professional program.

methodA longitudinal study of Norwegian occupational therapy students (analyzed n = 240) was conducted. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore occupational therapy students' perceptions of the learning environment, their approaches to studying, and exam grades as they related to the likelihood of consistent participation at three annual surveys.

resultsAnnual response rates varied between 55.1%, and 65.6%, and consistent participation was observed among 49.2%. The fully adjusted regression models showed that higher strategic approach scores increased the odds of consistent participation (adjusted OR: 1.04, p < 0.01), whereas higher surface approach scores decreased the odds of consistent participation (adjusted OR: 0.95, p < 0.05). Neither sociodemographic factors, learning environment factors nor academic performance predicted participation over time.

conclusionsResearchers can anticipate relatively high levels of attrition in longitudinal studies of occupational therapy students, but attrition seems to be largely proportional between groups. However, completers in longitudinal studies may be somewhat more well-organized and academically oriented than drop-outs.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceLearningStudents, MedicalAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleNorwayOccupational Therapy

Identifiers

PMID34170940
PMCPMC8232400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.