ArticleTrends in hearing
Reward Enhances Online Participants' Engagement With a Demanding Auditory Task.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07506408 (PLUS-Optimal for Adults With Listening Difficulties), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
PLUS-Optimal for Adults With Listening Difficulties: Investigating the Roles of Listening and Thinking Skills in Online Training Across Different Groups
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reliable Web-Based Auditory Cognitive Testing: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Observational
- Age Deficits in Associative Memory Are Not Alleviated by Multisensory Paradigms.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024Article
- Concurrent Encoding of Sequence Predictability and Event-Evoked Prediction Error in Unfolding Auditory Patterns.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Comparing online versus laboratory measures of speech perception in older children and adolescents.PloS one · 2024Article
- Divergent effects of listening demands and evaluative threat on listening effort in online and laboratory settings.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Article
- The effect of unisensory and multisensory information on lexical decision and free recall in young and older adults.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Implicit auditory memory in older listeners: From encoding to 6-month retention.Current research in neurobiology · 2023Article
- No Link Between Speech-in-Noise Perception and Auditory Sensory Memory - Evidence From a Large Cohort of Older and Younger Listeners.Trends in hearingArticle
- Robust and Efficient Online Auditory Psychophysics.Trends in hearingArticle
- Remote Matrix Sentence Test on Uncalibrated Consumer Devices: Test-Retest Reliability and Laboratory Agreement in Normal Hearing.Trends in hearingArticle
- Assessing Visual Contributions to the Perception of Speech in Noise.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Online recruitment platforms are increasingly used for experimental research. Crowdsourcing is associated with numerous benefits but also notable constraints, including lack of control over participants' environment and engagement. In the context of auditory experiments, these limitations may be particularly detrimental to threshold-based tasks that require effortful listening. Here, we ask whether incorporating a performance-based monetary bonus improves speech reception performance of online participants. In two experiments, participants performed an adaptive matrix-type speech-in-noise task (where listeners select two key words out of closed sets). In Experiment 1, our results revealed worse performance in online (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.