Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34170636›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols2021

A Neuroscientist's Guide to the Vole.

William M Kenkel, Morgan L Gustison, Annaliese K Beery

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A Demographic History of a Prairie Vole (Microtus ochrogaster) Breeding Colony (2004-2020).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A Demographic History of a Prairie Vole (bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The prairie vole gut-brain-microbiota-axis: a narrative review.Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William M KenkelDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Morgan L GustisonDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Annaliese K BeeryDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.

Funding

Updated confocal microscope in the Imaging Core facility to support biomedical researchP20GM103653 · NIGMS · DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HARRINGTON, MELISSA A · 2012 to 2022
$22.7M
The bonding brain: Substrates of social attachment in monogamous volesR01MH115267 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI OSTEN, PAVEL, PHELPS, STEVEN M · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
Reward mechanisms supporting affiliation between peersR15MH113085 · NIMH · SMITH COLLEGE · PI BEERY, ANNALIESE K. · 2017 to 2017
$361k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103653NIH HHS P20GM103653NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115267NIMH NIH HHS R01MH115267NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH113085NIMH NIH HHS R15MH113085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prairie voles have emerged as an important rodent model for understanding the neuroscience of social behavior. Prairie voles are well known for their capacity for pair bonding and alloparental care. These behavioral phenomena overlap with human social behavior but are not commonly observed in traditional rodent models. In this article, we highlight the many benefits of using prairie voles in neuroscience research. We begin by describing the advantages of using diverse and non-traditional study models. We then focus on social behaviors, including pair bonding, alloparental care, and peer interactions, that have brought voles to the forefront of social neuroscience. We describe many additional features of prairie vole biology and behavior that provide researchers with opportunities to address an array of research questions. We also survey neuroethological methods that have been used with prairie voles, from classic to modern techniques. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of other vole species, particularly meadow voles, and their own unique advantages for neuroscience studies. This article provides a foundation for researchers who are new to working with voles, as well as for experienced neuroscientists who want to expand their research scope. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Indexed as

ArvicolinaeSocial BehaviorAnimalsPeer Groupmeadow voleneuroscienceprairie voleresearch modelsocial behaviorvole

Identifiers

PMID34170636
PMCPMC8244171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.