Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34170619›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2021

Reference genomes of the two cultivated jute species.

Lilan Zhang, Xiaokai Ma, Xingtan Zhang, Yi Xu, Aminu Kurawa Ibrahim, Jiayu Yao, Huaxing Huang, Shuai Chen, Zhenyang Liao, Qing Zhang and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CountrywideFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genome-wide association study reveals loci and candidate genes of flowering time in jute (Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2023
    Article
  13. Identification ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Systematic evolution ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lilan ZhangKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding by Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Xiaokai MaCenter for Genomics and Biotechnology, Haixia Institue of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Xingtan ZhangCenter for Genomics and Biotechnology, Haixia Institue of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Yi XuKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding by Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Aminu Kurawa IbrahimKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding by Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Jiayu YaoKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding by Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Huaxing HuangCenter for Genomics and Biotechnology, Haixia Institue of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Shuai ChenCenter for Genomics and Biotechnology, Haixia Institue of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Zhenyang LiaoCenter for Genomics and Biotechnology, Haixia Institue of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Qing ZhangCenter for Genomics and Biotechnology, Haixia Institue of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Sylvain NiyitangaKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding by Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Jiaxin YuCenter for Genomics and Biotechnology, Haixia Institue of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Yi LiuCenter for Genomics and Biotechnology, Haixia Institue of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Xiuming XuCenter for Genomics and Biotechnology, Haixia Institue of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Jingjing WangCenter for Genomics and Biotechnology, Haixia Institue of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Aifen TaoKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding by Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Jiantang XuKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding by Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Siyuan ChenKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding by Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Xin YangKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding by Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Qingyao HeKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding by Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Lihui LinKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding by Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Pingping FangKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding by Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Liemei ZhangKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding by Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Ray MingDepartment of Plant Biology, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Jianmin QiKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding by Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Liwu ZhangKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding by Design, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8465-2476
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs · CNFujian Agriculture and Forestry University · CNUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultivated jute, which comprises the two species Corchorus capsularis and C. olitorius, is the second most important natural fibre source after cotton. Here we describe chromosome-level assemblies of the genomes of both cultivated species. The C. capsularis and C. olitorius assemblies are each comprised of seven pseudo-chromosomes, with the C. capsularis assembly consisting of 336 Mb with 25,874 genes and the C. olitorius assembly containing 361 Mb with 28 479 genes. Although the two Corchorus genomes exhibit collinearity, the genome of C. olitorius contains 25 Mb of additional sequences than that of C. capsularis with 13 putative inversions, which might give a hint to the difference of phenotypic variants between the two cultivated jute species. Analysis of gene expression in isolated fibre tissues reveals candidate genes involved in fibre development. Our analysis of the population structures of 242 cultivars from C. capsularis and 57 cultivars from C. olitorius by whole-genome resequencing resulted in post-domestication bottlenecks occurred ~2000 years ago in these species. We identified hundreds of putative significant marker-trait associations (MTAs) controlling fibre fineness, cellulose content and lignin content of fibre by integrating data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with data from analyses of selective sweeps due to natural and artificial selection in these two jute species. Among them, we further validated that CcCOBRA1 and CcC4H1 regulate fibre quality in transgenic plants via improving the biosynthesis of the secondary cell wall. Our results yielded important new resources for functional genomics research and genetic improvement in jute and allied fibre crops.

Indexed as

CorchorusGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsLigninSequence Analysis, DNALigninartificial selectionbast fibredomesticationgenomejute (Corchorus)

Identifiers

PMID34170619
PMCPMC8541789
OpenAlexW3174735454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.