ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2021
Robust regression based genome-wide multi-trait QTL analysis.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single- and multiple-trait quantitative trait locus analyses for seed oil and protein contents of soybean populations with advanced breeding line background.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024Article
- Identification of novel putative alleles related to important agronomic traits of wheat using robust strategies in GWAS.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In genome-wide quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping studies, multiple quantitative traits are often measured along with the marker genotypes. Multi-trait QTL (MtQTL) analysis, which includes multiple quantitative traits together in a single model, is an efficient technique to increase the power of QTL identification. The two most widely used classical approaches for MtQTL mapping are Gaussian Mixture Model-based MtQTL (GMM-MtQTL) and Linear Regression Model-based MtQTL (LRM-MtQTL) analyses. There are two types of LRM-MtQTL approach known as least squares-based LRM-MtQTL (LS-LRM-MtQTL) and maximum likelihood-based LRM-MtQTL (ML-LRM-MtQTL). These three classical approaches are equivalent alternatives for QTL detection, but ML-LRM-MtQTL is computationally faster than GMM-MtQTL and LS-LRM-MtQTL. However, one major limitation common to all the above classical approaches is that they are very sensitive to outliers, which leads to misleading results. Therefore, in this study, we developed an LRM-based robust MtQTL approach, called LRM-RobMtQTL, for the backcross population based on the robust estimation of regression parameters by maximizing the β-likelihood function induced from the β-divergence with multivariate normal distribution. When β = 0, the proposed LRM-RobMtQTL method reduces to the classical ML-LRM-MtQTL approach. Simulation studies showed that both ML-LRM-MtQTL and LRM-RobMtQTL methods identified the same QTL positions in the absence of outliers. However, in the presence of outliers, only the proposed method was able to identify all the true QTL positions. Real data analysis results revealed that in the presence of outliers only our LRM-RobMtQTL approach can identify all the QTL positions as those identified in the absence of outliers by both methods. We conclude that our proposed LRM-RobMtQTL analysis approach outperforms the classical MtQTL analysis methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34170407What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.