ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2022
[Chronic pain in pediatric primary care : What do adolescents and parents expect and how do they perceive treatment?]
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesRecurrent pain in childhood and adolescence is a common health problem. Pediatricians are usually the patients' first contact person. The current study investigated patients' and parents' expectations when consulting a pediatrician and their rating of the treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn 36 pediatric practices, 224 patients with recurrent pain and 273 parents participated in this cross-sectional tablet survey. The collected data included the motivation for arranging a physician consultation, pain concept, treatment expectations, and assessment of treatment. Additionally, the patients' age was investigated as an influencing factor.
resultsThe patients' and parents' predominant motivation for arranging a consultation was the clarification of the cause of pain. Older patients were additionally motivated by frequent but ineffective drug use. Predominantly in older patients, a biopsychosocial pain explanation was identified. Approximately half of all patients and parents indicated biological and psychological influencing factors. The most frequent expectation of the consultation was obtaining information on pain management. Overall, consultations were rated very positively, especially when patients and parents felt understood and taken seriously.
conclusionsInformation about the cause of pain and pain management are essential for patients and parents. Besides good communication, sufficient time resources of the practitioner are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34170398What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.