Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34170359›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2021

[Influence of the working model on the education of young urologists : Education through the ages].

D Pfister, M Bündgen, M Schmautz, F H Hartmann, A Heidenreich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [New working time models-what is possible and how?]Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D PfisterKlinik für Urologie, Uroonkologie, spezielle urologische und roboter-assistierte Chirurgie, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. david.pfister@uk-koeln.de.
M Bündgen
M Schmautz
F H Hartmann
A Heidenreich

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a trend of increasing discontent of urologic residents with educational programs. One point being mentioned is lack of time during residency for education and self-training. We analyzed the available time for education in our department depending on the used working model through the last 25 years. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe calculated the absolute availability of residents during their residency for working models in 1996, 2000, 2007 and 2017. As a basis we used the working model of 1996 as no compensatory time-off for being on call was used. All days on which a delayed start is planned and no schedule in daily routine is possible had been excluded from education time. The numbers implemented in the regulation on further education in the corresponding years had been used to calculate the expenditure of time on the basis of median length of the different intervention. In addition, the patient numbers on the ward and our outpatient clinic had been documented over time.

resultsWith increasing patient numbers in the in- and outpatient clinic there is a continuous decreasing time available for education. The absolute available time in our department is calculated to be 3.1 years compared to 5 years in 1996. With the first day of training a resident has to complete 66.9 min of self-contained diagnostics or interventions per day in addition to clinical routine and administration to meet the requested numbers of the regulation on further education.

conclusionsThe limited time being available for the educational program is improved by the current regulation of education. To teach the complex segments of urology there is an urgent need for a well-structured curriculum, which should be used nationwide.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyUrologyCurriculumHumansUrologistsBurn-outCompensatory time-offWork-life balanceWorkload

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.