ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2021
[DeRAS I-German situation of robotic-assisted surgery-an online survey].
Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Artificial intelligence in surgical disciplines: Clinical application, advantages, and potential-a Delphi expert consensus].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- [Is the application of digital technologies the game changer for surgical training of the future? A Germany-wide analysis].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Practice patterns of paediatric surgeons on treating pilonidal sinus disease - a national survey study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Modified Delphi Procedure to Achieve Consensus for the Concept of a National Curriculum for Minimally Invasive and Robot-assisted Surgery in Germany (GeRMIQ).Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie · 2025Article
- [Robotic adrenalectomy-current evidence].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Skill progress during a dedicated societal robotic surgery training curriculum including several robotic surgery platforms.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Observational
- The training pathway for residents: 'Robotic Curriculum for young Surgeons' (RoCS) does not impair patient outcome during implementation into clinical routine.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- [Robotic rectal surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- [Robots in visceral and thoracic surgery-Quo vadis?]Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- [Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on robotic visceral surgery in Germany].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- [Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer-New technologies, modern concepts].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobotic assistance has become established in surgery but is not yet a standard procedure. The current status of clinical dissemination in Germany remains unclear. Industry independent sources are scarce. AIM OF THE WORK: The aim of this survey was to investigate the current status of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) across specialties in Germany from 2014 to 2018. MATERIAL AND
methodsAn internet search was used to identify hospitals and departments (DP) with access to RAS. The DPs were asked to share their data from 2014-2018. In addition to clinical data, data on utilization, implementation, training, and funding were requested.
resultsAs of 31 December 2018 RAS was offered at 121 hospitals in Germany, 383 DPs with access to RAS were identified and 26% (n = 98) of DPs responded. On average each DP had two consultant surgeons, 10% of DPs had more than one RAS system and 100% of the RAS systems recorded were from Intuitive Surgical Inc., CA, USA. RAS was implemented in 65% in urology and in 12% in visceral surgery (VS). 21% of programs were interdisciplinary and 4% multidisciplinary (> 3). 83% of systems were purchased and 17% otherwise funded. For additional operating room costs, 74% of hospitals reported paying for them themselves. 14% chose pay as you go. Since 2014, procedures increased by a factor of 4 to approximately 8000. The proportion of VS increased by a factor of 5 since 2016.
conclusionRAS in Germany experienced strong growth through 2018. The range of procedures is similar to that of laparoscopy. With a current lack of reimbursement for the additional technical effort, RAS is predominantly used in the medium and high complexity range. The online survey is a good method to collect independent data without high administrative effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.