Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34170330›Full record

ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2022

Assessment of salivary stress and pain biomarkers and their relation to self-reported pain intensity during orthodontic tooth movement: a longitudinal and prospective study.

Nehir Canigur Bavbek, Erdal Bozkaya, Sila Cagri Isler, Sehri Elbeg, Ahu Uraz, Sema Yuksel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Pain assessment using prostaglandin EJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nehir Canigur BavbekDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 82nd Road No:2 Emek Cankaya, 06510, Ankara, Turkey. ncanigur@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3893-7256
Erdal BozkayaDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 82nd Road No:2 Emek Cankaya, 06510, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7341-9361
Sila Cagri IslerDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5419-9658
Sehri ElbegDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8911-8336
Ahu UrazDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6281-6855
Sema YukselDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 82nd Road No:2 Emek Cankaya, 06510, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6470-0159
Gazi University · TRÇankaya University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the relationship between pain intensity and concentrations of salivary pain and stress biomarkers during orthodontic tooth movement.

methodsEighteen patients (8 males, 10 females; mean age 14.57 ± 2.39 years) who needed orthodontic treatment with maxillary premolar extraction and segmental canine distalization participated in this study. Baseline samples were collected (T1), and orthodontic attachments were placed to maxillary first molars, second premolars, and canines. Then extractions were performed. After 1‑month follow-up, canine distalization started with a segmental wire (T2). Concentrations of salivary α‑amylase (sAA), cortisol, secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) and chromogranin A (CgA) were examined at T1, T2, and on days 4 (T3), 7 (T4), 14 (T5), and 30 (T6) after starting retraction. Participants also scored their pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Pain catastrophizing behavior and dental anxiety levels of the participants were evaluated by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale (C-DAS), respectively. Repeated measure ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient analysis were used for statistical evaluations (p < 0.05).

resultsThe maximum values for sAA were seen at T1. Males had higher sAA levels than females with statistical differences at T1, T3, and T4. No significant differences for cortisol, sIgA, and CgA concentrations were observed. The highest mean VAS score was recorded at T3. No correlations were detected between any salivary biomarkers, VAS, C‑DAS, and PCS scores.

conclusionsThe stress of starting orthodontic treatment increased sAA levels more than the pain that was experienced during orthodontic tooth movement. Being male was a predictor of higher sAA concentrations. Orthodontic tooth movement did not cause significant alterations in salivary pain and stress biomarkers.

Indexed as

HydrocortisoneTooth Movement TechniquesBiomarkersFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin A, SecretoryMalePainPain MeasurementProspective StudiesSelf ReportBiomarkersHydrocortisoneImmunoglobulin A, SecretoryChromogranin ACortisolDental painSalivary alpha-amylaseSecretory immunoglobulin A

Identifiers

PMID34170330
OpenAlexW3174713282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.