ArticleMedical mycology2021
Association of semi-quantitative cryptococcal antigen results in plasma with subclinical cryptococcal meningitis and mortality among patients with advanced HIV disease.
Article in Medical mycology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Improving Access to Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnostics and Treatment in Malawi.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- Uptake of lumbar puncture and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus disease who screened for serum cryptococcal-antigen in Africa.World journal of virology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven mobile interpretation of a semi-quantitative cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay.IMA fungus · 2024Article
- Immunologic Diagnosis of Endemic Mycoses.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Blood cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) titers >160 are associated with concurrent subclinical cryptococcal meningitis (CM). When lumbar puncture (LP) is not immediately available in a CrAg screening program, semi-quantitative CrAg assays may provide risk stratification for CM. Two semi-quantitative assays (SQ [Immuno-Mycologics, Norman, OK, USA] and CryptoPS [Biosynex, Strasbourg, France]) were evaluated against a qualitative lateral flow assay (LFA) using 194 plasma samples from a cohort of HIV-seropositive individuals with CD4 counts <100 cells/μl. We compared SQ and CryptoPS results to titers for LFA-positive samples. Among patients with LP, we examined the association between semi-quantitative CrAg results and CM. We used a Cox proportional hazards model to determine the association between SQ score and mortality. Of 194 participants, 60 (31%) had positive LFA results, of whom 41 (68%) had a titer of ≤160 and 19 (32%) a titer >160. Fifty individuals with antigenemia had an LP; a clinically useful SQ score that identified all ten cases of subclinical CM was ≥3 (100% sensitivity, 55% specificity). Patients with an SQ score of 3 or 4 also had a 2.2-fold increased adjusted hazards of 6-month mortality (95% CI: 0.79-6.34; p = 0.13) versus those with score of <3. Nine of ten patients with subclinical CM had a strong-positive CryptoPS result versus 10/40 without subclinical CM (p < 0.001). Semi-quantitative assays offered a sensitive though not specific means of gauging the risk of concurrent CM in this patient population. LAY SUMMARY: We evaluated two single-step laboratory tests that can quantify the amount of cryptococcal antigen in plasma of patients with advanced HIV disease and could thus gauge the risk of concurrent cryptococcal meningitis and subsequent mortality. These tests are not a substitute for a lumbar puncture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.