Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34169964›Full record

ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2021

Pervasiveness of Biological Impacts of Artificial Light at Night.

Kevin J Gaston, Simone Ackermann, Jonathan Bennie, Daniel T C Cox, Benjamin B Phillips, Alejandro Sánchez de Miguel, Dirk Sanders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Artificial light at night: a global disruptor of the night-time environment.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Does artificial light at night alter moth community composition?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Long-term exposure to experimental light affects the ground-dwelling invertebrate community, independent of light spectra.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. How artificial light at night may rewire ecological networks: concepts and models.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kevin J GastonEnvironment & Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.
Simone AckermannEnvironment & Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.
Jonathan BennieEnvironment & Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.
Daniel T C CoxEnvironment & Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.
Benjamin B PhillipsEnvironment & Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.
Alejandro Sánchez de MiguelEnvironment & Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.
Dirk SandersEnvironment & Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial light at night (ALAN) and its associated biological impacts have regularly been characterized as predominantly urban issues. Although far from trivial, this would imply that these impacts only affect ecosystems that are already heavily modified by humans and are relatively limited in their spatial extent, at least as compared with some key anthropogenic pressures on the environment that attract much more scientific and public attention, such as climate change or plastic pollution. However, there are a number of reasons to believe that ALAN and its impacts are more pervasive, and therefore need to be viewed from a broader geographic perspective rather than an essentially urban one. Here we address, in turn, 11 key issues when considering the degree of spatial pervasiveness of the biological impacts of ALAN. First, the global extent of ALAN is likely itself commonly underestimated, as a consequence of limitations of available remote sensing data sources and how these are processed. Second and third, more isolated (rural) and mobile (e.g., vehicle headlight) sources of ALAN may have both very widespread and important biological influences. Fourth and fifth, the occurrence and impacts of ALAN in marine systems and other remote settings, need much greater consideration. Sixth, seventh, and eighth, there is growing evidence for important biological impacts of ALAN at low light levels, from skyglow, and over long distances (because of the altitudes from which it may be viewed by some organisms), all of which would increase the areas over which impacts are occurring. Ninth and tenth, ALAN may exert indirect biological effects that may further expand these areas, because it has a landscape ecology (modifying movement and dispersal and so hence with effects beyond the direct extent of ALAN), and because ALAN interacts with other anthropogenic pressures on the environment. Finally, ALAN is not stable, but increasing rapidly in global extent, and shifting toward wavelengths of light that often have greater biological impacts.

Indexed as

EcosystemEnvironmental PollutionLightAnimals

Identifiers

PMID34169964
PMCPMC8490694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.