Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34169677›Full record

ArticleThe world journal of men's health2021

COVID Pandemic Impact on Healthcare Provision and Patient Psychosocial Distress: A Multi-National Cross-Sectional Survey among Asia-Pacific Countries.

Eric Chung, Bang-Ping Jiann, Koichi Nagao, Lukman Hakim, William Huang, Joe Lee, Haocheng Lin, Dung Ba Tien Mai, Quang Nguyen, Hyun Jun Park and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The world journal of men's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Eric ChungAndroUrology Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3373-3668
Bang-Ping JiannDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Koichi NagaoDepartment of Urology, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2798-4567
Lukman HakimDepartment of Urology, Airlangga University, Dr Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1518-8010
William HuangDepartment of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Joe LeeDepartment of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0997-2757
Haocheng LinDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5333-6611
Dung Ba Tien MaiDepartment of Urology, Binh Dan Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Quang NguyenCentre of Andrology, Department of Urology, Viet Duc University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hyun Jun ParkDepartment of Urology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0566-9574
Yoshikazu SatoDepartment of Urology, Sanjukai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2205-1357
Kavirach TantiwongseDepartment of Urology, Chulalongkorn University Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Yiming YuanAndrology Centre, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8312-0723
Kwangsung ParkDepartment of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-162X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCOVID pandemic significantly affected the delivery and maintenance of healthcare system, resulting in greater utilization of digital health interventions. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis multi-national cross-sectional survey was administered to clinicians working in major Asia-Pacific cities during the mandatory social lockdown period in June 2020. Clinical demographics and professional data, delivery of Andrology-related healthcare services, and patient distress based on validated questionnaires such as Depression and Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) and Decisional Engagement Scale (DES) were collected.

resultsTelehealth medicine was instituted in all the centres with the majority of centres (92.9%) reported a 50% or more reduction in out-patient related services. The numbers of phone calls, emails correspondence and educational webinars have significantly increased. Despite the provision of reasons for changes in healthcare service and delay in surgery, more than half of the patients (57.1%) rated 2 on the DASS score for the item on patients over-react to situations, while a third of the patients (35.7%) scored a 2 for DASS item on patients being more demanding or unreasonable. The DES scores were more positive with most patients reported a score above 7 out of 10 in terms of items on accepting current arrangement (85.7%), confident in clinician decision-making about treatment (92.9%) and comfortable that the decision is consistent with their preferences (71.4%). Most patients (85.7%) indicated their preferences for more detailed information on healthcare provision.

conclusionsOur study showed telehealth services were integrated early and successfully during the COVID pandemic and patients were generally receptive with minimal psychosocial distress.

Indexed as

AndrologyCOVID-19Digital technologyPsychological distressTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34169677
PMCPMC8444000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.