Trial reportJournal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics2021
Vancomycin area under the curves estimated with pharmacokinetic equations using trough-only data.
Trial report in Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vancomycin area under the curves estimated with pharmacokinetic equations using trough-only data.Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics · 2021Trial
- Exploring the effects of renal and cardiac functions on the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- An automated pipeline to generate initial estimates for population Pharmacokinetic base models.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2025Article
- Use of nomograms based on the one-compartment model in the estimation of area under the blood concentration-time curve of vancomycin: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- A pilot study evaluating mid-point vancomycin concentrations to estimate pharmacokinetics and area under the curve: a prospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Vancomycin levels for Bayesian dose-optimization in critical care: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Automated calculation and reporting of vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve: a simplified single-trough concentration-based equation approach.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Performance of Bayesian Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve-Based Pharmacokinetic Dosing Based on a One-Compartment Model and Trough-Only Monitoring for Vancomycin.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND
objectiveThe revised vancomycin monitoring guidelines recommend targeting an area under the curve (AUC) of 400-600 mg*hr/L for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. An AUC can be measured by checking a peak and trough concentration at steady state; however, this requires obtaining an additional blood sample. The most practical way to perform AUC-guided dosing is by estimating an AUC from a steady-state trough. The purpose of this study was to compare AUCs estimated from trough-only data to AUCs calculated from peak and trough concentrations.
methodsSteady-state peak and trough data were collected from an open-access clinical calculator VancoPK.com. Patients were included who had (1) peaks drawn ≥60 min after the end of infusion, (2) peak and trough levels drawn ≥4 h apart and (3) troughs drawn ≤4 h early or late. The population was randomized and divided into a model group and test group. A population equation for vancomycin volume of distribution (Vd) was derived and compared to other general adult Vd models. Accuracy and precision of estimated AUCs were measured with bias, root mean square error (RMSE) and Lin's concordance correlation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 2,500 adult patients were included in the model group and 1,843 were included in the test group. The derived Vd equation, Vd (L) = 0.29(age) +0.33(total BW in kg) +11, produced accurate and precise AUC estimates from trough-only data. The mean actual AUC and estimated AUC were 504 and 503, respectively, with a correlation of 0.926. The RMSE between estimated and actual AUCs was 47.7, meaning that over 95% of estimated AUCs were within 100 points of actual AUCs with the study's Vd model. Other Vd models performed well for certain types of patients, depending on their body weight and age. WHAT IS NEW AND
conclusionThere is limited evidence from large, robust populations regarding how to estimate Vd for general adult patients. Accuracy and precision of estimated AUCs depend on the applied population Vd model. The Vd model from the present study can be used for AUC-guided dosing with trough-only data which requires less blood work than peak-trough monitoring. AUC calculations are practical with the use of open-access websites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.