ArticleMedical physics2021
A signal detection model for quantifying overregularization in nonlinear image reconstruction.
Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving depth-resolution, in-plane contrast, and reducing non-uniformity artifacts for wide-angle DBT.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Constrained one-step material decomposition reconstruction of head CT data from a silicon photon-counting prototype.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Visualization of the distortion induced by nonlinear noise reduction in computed tomography.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Addressing CT metal artifacts using photon-counting detectors and one-step spectral CT image reconstruction.Medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many useful image quality metrics for evaluating linear image reconstruction techniques do not apply to or are difficult to interpret for nonlinear image reconstruction. The vast majority of metrics employed for evaluating nonlinear image reconstruction are based on some form of global image fidelity, such as image root mean square error (RMSE). Use of such metrics can lead to overregularization in the sense that they can favor removal of subtle details in the image. To address this shortcoming, we develop an image quality metric based on signal detection that serves as a surrogate to the qualitative loss of fine image details. The metric is demonstrated in the context of a breast CT simulation, where different equal-dose configurations are considered. The configurations differ in the number of projections acquired. Image reconstruction is performed with a nonlinear algorithm based on total variation constrained least-squares (TV-LSQ). The resulting images are studied as a function of three parameters: number of views acquired, total variation constraint value, and number of iterations. The images are evaluated visually, with image RMSE, and with the proposed signal-detection-based metric. The latter uses a small signal, and computes detectability in the sinogram and in the reconstructed image. Loss of signal detectability through the image reconstruction process is taken as a quantitative measure of loss of fine details in the image. Loss of signal detectability is seen to correlate well with the blocky or patchy appearance due to overregularization with TV-LSQ, and this trend runs counter to the image RMSE metric, which tends to favor the over-regularized images. The proposed signal detection-based metric provides an image quality assessment that is complimentary to that of image RMSE. Using the two metrics in concert may yield a useful prescription for determining CT algorithm and configuration parameters when nonlinear image reconstruction is used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.