ReviewPharmacoEconomics2021
Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework.
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital self-management programme for pain, fatigue and faecal incontinence in inflammatory bowel disease: cost-effectiveness analysis of the IBD-BOOST randomised controlled trial.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2026Trial
- Trial
- An economic evaluation of the MultICath randomised controlled trial, comparing combined use of reusable and single-use intermittent catheters to single-use catheters only.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- Designing evaluation infrastructure for psychedelic harm reduction at events: a methodological framework with formative mixed-methods field application.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A Bottom-Up Analysis of the Cost of Illness of Parkinson's Disease in the Netherlands from a Societal Perspective.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- Outcomes and measures in studies of techniques to promote secretion clearance in individuals with neuromuscular conditions: a scoping review.ERJ open research · 2025Review
- Emergency department interventions and their effect on subsequent healthcare resource use after discharge: an overview of systematic reviews.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Review
- The Development of a New Approach for the Harmonized Multi-Sectoral and Multi-Country Cost Valuation of Services: The PECUNIA Reference Unit Cost (RUC) Templates.Applied health economics and health policy · 2024Article
- Health Service Utilisation of People Living with Psychosis: Validity of Self-report Compared with Administrative Data in a Randomised Controlled Trial.Applied health economics and health policy · 2024Article
- A novel set of Austrian reference unit costs for comprehensive societal perspectives consistent with latest European costing methods for economic evaluations.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2024Article
- Agreement between self-reports and statutory health insurance claims data on healthcare utilization in patients with mental disorders.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Developing a Framework of Cost Elements of Socioeconomic Burden of Rare Disease: A Scoping Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2023Article
- Development of an Instrument for the Assessment of Health-Related Multi-sectoral Resource Use in Europe: The PECUNIA RUM.Applied health economics and health policy · 2023Article
- Development and test-retest reliability of a new, self-report questionnaire assessing healthcare use and personal costs in people with inflammatory bowel disease: the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Resource Use Questionnaire (IBD-RUQ).Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- In Search for Comparability: The PECUNIA Reference Unit Costs for Health and Social Care Services in Europe.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile the methods for conducting health economics research in general are improving, current guidelines provide limited guidance regarding resource use measurement (RUM). Consequently, a variety of methods exists, yet there is no overview of aspects to consider when deciding on the most appropriate RUM methodology. Therefore, this study aims to (1) identify and categorize existing knowledge regarding aspects of RUM, and (2) develop a framework that provides a comprehensive overview of methodological aspects regarding RUM.
methodsRelevant articles were identified by enrolling a search string in six databases and handsearching the DIRUM database. Included articles were descriptively reviewed and served as input for a comprehensive framework. Health economics experts were involved during the process to establish the framework's face validity.
resultsForty articles were included in the scoping review. The RUM framework consists of four methodological RUM domains: 'Whom to measure', addressing whom to ask and whom to measure; 'How to measure', addressing the different approaches of measurement; 'How often to measure', addressing recall period and measurement patterns; and 'Additional considerations', which covers additional aspects that are essential for further refining the methodologies for measurement. Evidence retrieved from the scoping review was categorized according to these domains.
conclusionThis study clustered the aspects of RUM methodology in health economics into a comprehensive framework. The results may guide health economists in their decision making regarding the selection of appropriate RUM methods and developing instruments for RUM. Furthermore, policy makers may use these findings to review study results from an evidence-based perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.