Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34169465›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

Object and anatomical feature recognition in surgical video images based on a convolutional neural network.

Yoshiko Bamba, Shimpei Ogawa, Michio Itabashi, Hironari Shindo, Shingo Kameoka, Takahiro Okamoto, Masakazu Yamamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yoshiko BambaDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1, Kawadacho Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan. bamba.yoshiko@twmu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7139-8576
Shimpei OgawaDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1, Kawadacho Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Michio ItabashiDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1, Kawadacho Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Hironari ShindoOtsuki Municipal Central Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.
Shingo KameokaUshiku Aiwa Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
Takahiro OkamotoDepartment of Breast Endocrinology Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masakazu YamamotoDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1, Kawadacho Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeArtificial intelligence-enabled techniques can process large amounts of surgical data and may be utilized for clinical decision support to recognize or forecast adverse events in an actual intraoperative scenario. To develop an image-guided navigation technology that will help in surgical education, we explored the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based computer vision system in detecting intraoperative objects.

methodsThe surgical videos used for annotation were recorded during surgeries conducted in the Department of Surgery of Tokyo Women's Medical University from 2019 to 2020. Abdominal endoscopic images were cut out from manually captured surgical videos. An open-source programming framework for CNN was used to design a model that could recognize and segment objects in real time through IBM Visual Insights. The model was used to detect the GI tract, blood, vessels, uterus, forceps, ports, gauze and clips in the surgical images.

resultsThe accuracy, precision and recall of the model were 83%, 80% and 92%, respectively. The mean average precision (mAP), the calculated mean of the precision for each object, was 91%. Among surgical tools, the highest recall and precision of 96.3% and 97.9%, respectively, were achieved for forceps. Among the anatomical structures, the highest recall and precision of 92.9% and 91.3%, respectively, were achieved for the GI tract.

conclusionThe proposed model could detect objects in operative images with high accuracy, highlighting the possibility of using AI-based object recognition techniques for intraoperative navigation. Real-time object recognition will play a major role in navigation surgery and surgical education.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeural Networks, ComputerEndoscopyFemaleHumansComputer visionConvolutional neural networkImage-guided navigation technologyObject detectionSurgical education

Identifiers

PMID34169465
PMCPMC8224261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.