Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34169458›Full record

ArticleDrugs & aging2021

Attitudes to Drug Use in Residential Aged Care Facilities: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Nurses and Care Staff.

Sarita Y Lo, Emily Reeve, Amy T Page, Syed Tabish R Zaidi, Sarah N Hilmer, Christopher Etherton-Beer, Andrew McLachlan, Lisa Pont, Vasi Naganathan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sarita Y LoCentre for Education and Research on Ageing, Concord Repatriation General Hospital and Concord Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Sarita.Lo@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5272-9958
Emily ReeveQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Amy T PageWestern Australian Centre for Health and Ageing, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Syed Tabish R ZaidiSchool of Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Sarah N HilmerLaboratory of Ageing and Pharmacology, Royal North Shore Hospital and Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Christopher Etherton-BeerWestern Australian Centre for Health and Ageing, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Andrew McLachlanSydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lisa PontDiscipline of Pharmacy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Vasi NaganathanCentre for Education and Research on Ageing, Concord Repatriation General Hospital and Concord Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of South Australia · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResidential aged care facility (RACF) staff are well placed to identify opportunities for more appropriate prescribing. However, little is known about their views of polypharmacy, deprescribing and specific medications.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to establish the beliefs and attitudes of RACF staff towards polypharmacy and medication use in residents.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted on RACF staff in metropolitan New South Wales, Australia using a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was drafted based on the available literature and research team expertise and then piloted by a mixed group of 13 RACF staff. The final version of the questionnaire consisted of 28 questions. A total of 38 RACFs were contacted about the study. The questionnaire was distributed to eligible RACF staff between October 2017 and October 2019. The RACF staff were eligible if they provided direct patient care to residents or worked as a facility manager. Participants were excluded if they had insufficient English language skills. The results were presented in two groups, the nursing and care staff, using descriptive statistics.

resultsA total of 176 individuals from nine RACFs completed the questionnaire of whom 160 were eligible for study inclusion. Most considered polypharmacy to be five or more different tablets and capsules per day (95% nursing and 82% care staff respectively). A wide range of beliefs about medication use and deprescribing that centred on what constitutes appropriate polypharmacy was identified. Most thought that preventive medications were essential for residents. Most nurses agreed that sleeping tablets and pharmacological management of verbal aggression and wandering behaviours should be used less frequently whilst most care staff agreed that medications should be used more frequently to manage physical aggression.

conclusionsTo successfully and sustainably optimise medication use in RACF residents, it is important to consider the variation in views of nurses and care staff.

Indexed as

NursesPharmaceutical PreparationsAgedAttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesHomes for the AgedHumansPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID34169458
OpenAlexW3175319780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.