Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34169401›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021

Developmental potential of immature human oocytes aspirated after controlled ovarian stimulation.

Rachel S Mandelbaum, Michael S Awadalla, Meghan B Smith, Caroline J Violette, Brittany L Klooster, Rachel B Danis, Lynda K McGinnis, Jacqueline R Ho, Kristin A Bendikson, Richard J Paulson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Histories and mysteries underlying meiotic maturation failure in human oocytes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The spectrum ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rachel S MandelbaumDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8611-1462
Michael S AwadallaDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Meghan B SmithDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Caroline J VioletteDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Brittany L KloosterDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rachel B DanisDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lynda K McGinnisDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jacqueline R HoDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kristin A BendiksonDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Richard J PaulsonDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ali AhmadyDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. ali.ahmady@med.usc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for initially immature oocytes that mature in vitro is controversial and practice varies widely. While it may increase the number of usable embryos, it may also be time-intensive and potentially low-yield. This study sought to elucidate which patients may benefit from ICSI of initially immature oocytes that matured in vitro.

methodsA retrospective study comparing fertilization, cleavage, blastulation, and embryo usage rates between sibling initially immature and mature oocytes that underwent ICSI between 2015 and 2019 was performed. Outcomes of initially immature oocytes were stratified by initial maturation stage, timing of progression to metaphase II (MII) in vitro, percentage of mature oocytes in the cycle, and female age.

resultsTen thousand eight hundred seventeen oocytes from 889 cycles were included. Of 3137 (29.0%) initially immature oocytes, 418 (13.3%) reached MII later on the day of retrieval (day 0) and 1493 (47.6%) on day 1. Overall, embryos originating from initially immature oocytes had lower cleavage and blastulation rates compared to those from initially mature oocytes (P<0.05, all groups). However, embryos from oocytes that matured later on day 0 comprised a unique subset that had clinically similar cleavage (75% vs 80%, RR 0.93, P=0.047) and blastulation rates (41% vs 50%, RR 0.81, P=0.024) compared to initially mature oocytes. Women with low percentages of mature oocytes in the cycle overall and women ≥40 in cleavage cycles derived the highest relative benefit from the use of immature oocytes.

conclusionICSI of immature oocytes, particularly those that mature later on the day of retrieval, may improve numbers of usable embryos. This study supports routine reassessment of immature oocytes for progression to MII and ICSI on day 0. An additional reassessment on day 1 may also be of use in older women or those with low percentage of mature oocytes.

Indexed as

Embryonic DevelopmentOogenesisAdultEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansIn Vitro Oocyte Maturation TechniquesOocytesOvulation InductionRetrospective StudiesSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicControlled ovarian stimulationImmature oocytesIntracytoplasmic sperm injectionIn vitro maturation

Identifiers

PMID34169401
PMCPMC8490553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.