Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34169280›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2021

FINER: enhancing the prediction of tissue-specific functions of isoforms by refining isoform interaction networks.

Hao Chen, Dipan Shaw, Dongbo Bu, Tao Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hao ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3424-835X
Dipan ShawDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9556-0243
Dongbo BuKey Lab of Intelligent Information Process, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Tao JiangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3833-4498

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Annotating the functions of gene products is a mainstay in biology. A variety of databases have been established to record functional knowledge at the gene level. However, functional annotations at the isoform resolution are in great demand in many biological applications. Although critical information in biological processes such as protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is often used to study gene functions, it does not directly help differentiate the functions of isoforms, as the 'proteins' in the existing PPIs generally refer to 'genes'. On the other hand, the prediction of isoform functions and prediction of isoform-isoform interactions, though inherently intertwined, have so far been treated as independent computational problems in the literature. Here, we present FINER, a unified framework to jointly predict isoform functions and refine PPIs from the gene level to the isoform level, enabling both tasks to benefit from each other. Extensive computational experiments on human tissue-specific data demonstrate that FINER is able to gain at least 5.16% in AUC and 15.1% in AUPRC for functional prediction across multiple tissues by refining noisy PPIs, resulting in significant improvement over the state-of-the-art methods. Some in-depth analyses reveal consistency between FINER's predictions and the tissue specificity as well as subcellular localization of isoforms.

Identifiers

PMID34169280
PMCPMC8219044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.