ArticleACS applied bio materials2020
Single-molecule Study on the Interactions between Cyclic Nonribosomal Peptides and Protein Nanopore.
Article in ACS applied bio materials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sub-Nanomolar Detection and Discrimination of Microcystin Congeners Using Aerolysin Nanopores.ACS nano · 2026Article
- Nanopore Environmental Analysis.JACS Au · 2025Review
- Pioneering Role of Nanopore Single-Molecule Sensing in Environmental and Food Surveillance.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Nanopore discrimination and sensitive plasma detection of multiple natriuretic peptides: The representative biomarker of human heart failure.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2023Article
- Detection of Tobacco Bacterial Wilt Caused byNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Nanopore Detection Assisted DNA Information Processing.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Recent advances in biological nanopores for nanopore sequencing, sensing and comparison of functional variations in MspA mutants.RSC advances · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Nonribosomal peptides (NRPs) are a type of secondary metabolites mostly originated from microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi. Their proteolytic stability, highly selective bioactivity, and microorganism-specificity have made them an attractive source of drugs for the pharmaceutical industry. Herein, with microcystins (MCs) as a NRP model, we, for the first time, proposed a sensitive method to study the interactions between NRPs and the protein nanopore. Due to the large molecular size (~3 nm diameter) of MCs and their net negative charges, MCs failed to translocate through the α-hemolysin (α-HL) protein channel. Our results demonstrated that the biomolecular interaction of MC-α-HL protein was significantly affected by the applied potential bias. The constant blockage amplitude in the voltage-dependent studies indicated that the current modulation events were dominantly contributed to the bumping interaction between MCs and the α-HL protein under the electrophoretic force. The mean residence time of the bumping events exhibited a two-stage decrease (from 1.90 ms to 1.02 ms, and from 1.02 ms to 0.69 ms) at the threshold voltages of -70 mV and -100 mV, respectively. Using our strategy (i.e., based on their electrophoretic driven interaction with the α-HL protein pore), discrimination of different MC molecules (MC-LR, MC-RR, MC-YR and linear analog) with varied branched residues could be accomplished. This work should provide an insight in developing a rapid and effective method for the identification of cyclic NRPs as valuable biomarkers for fungal infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.