Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34169140›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2021

Service usage of a cohort of formerly homeless women in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Brodie Fraser, Maddie White, Hera Cook, Elinor Chisholm, Jenny Ombler, Saera Chun, Hiria Tareha, Nevil Pierse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brodie FraserHe Kāinga Oranga, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Maddie WhiteInstitute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Germany.
Hera CookHe Kāinga Oranga, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Elinor ChisholmHe Kāinga Oranga, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Jenny OmblerHe Kāinga Oranga, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Saera ChunHe Kāinga Oranga, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Hiria TarehaWellington Homeless Women's Trust, New Zealand.
Nevil PierseHe Kāinga Oranga, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this paper is to explore government service usage across the domains of health, justice, and social development and tax for a cohort of formerly homeless people in Aotearoa New Zealand, focusing specifically on the experiences of women. The Integrated Data Infrastructure is used, which links our de-identified cohort data with administrative data from various Aotearoa New Zealand Government departments.

resultsOf the cohort of 390, the majority (53.8%) were women. These women were more likely to be younger (57.1% were aged 25-44), indigenous Māori (78.6%), and have children (81.4%). These women had lower incomes, and higher rates of welfare benefit receipt, when compared to men in the cohort and a control group of women from the wider population.

conclusionsThe cohort were primarily female, younger, Māori, and parents. They earned much less than their non-homeless counterparts, and relied heavily on government support. The neoliberalisation of the welfare state, high rates of women's poverty, and the gendered nature of parenthood means that women's homelessness is distinct from men's homelessness.

Indexed as

HomelessnessHousing firstLinked dataNew ZealandWomen

Identifiers

PMID34169140
PMCPMC8209275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.