ArticleFrontiers in public health2021
Factors Influencing Development and Implementation of Patients' Access to Electronic Health Records-A Comparative Study of Sweden and the Netherlands.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing the User Experience of a Perioperative Digital Health Tool for Information Exchange Using a Human-Centered Design Thinking Approach: Qualitative Observational Study.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2026Observational
- Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Implementing Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records in Primary Care: Qualitative Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Analysis of Patients' Dietary Status/Restrictions Following Instrumental Swallow Evaluations in Skilled Nursing Facilities.Dysphagia · 2025Article
- Leveraging machine learning in nursing: innovations, challenges, and ethical insights.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Service Design and Evaluation of OpenNotes for Craniofacial Deformity Management in Patients and their Caregivers.Healthcare informatics research · 2024Article
- Sociotechnical Cross-Country Analysis of Contextual Factors That Impact Patients' Access to Electronic Health Records in 4 European Countries: Framework Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- A Nordic Perspective on Patient Online Record Access and the European Health Data Space.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- The Implementation of Federated Digital Identifiers in Health Care: Rapid Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
- Patient Online Record Access in English Primary Care: Qualitative Survey Study of General Practitioners' Views.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Stakeholders barriers and facilitators for the implementation of a personalised digital care pathway: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Patient empowerment through online access to health records.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Article
- Usability of the Swedish Accessible Electronic Health Record: Qualitative Survey Study.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
- What do primary care staff think about patients accessing electronic health records? A focus group study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Understanding older adults' intention to use patient-accessible electronic health records: Based on the affordance lens.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.