Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34168956›Full record

ArticlePhotoacoustics2021

Prostate cancer identification via photoacoustic spectroscopy and machine learning.

Yingna Chen, Chengdang Xu, Zhaoyu Zhang, Anqi Zhu, Xixi Xu, Jing Pan, Ying Liu, Denglong Wu, Shengsong Huang, Qian Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photoacoustics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optical and Optoacoustic Imaging.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. TowardsFundamental research · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yingna ChenInstitute of Acoustics, School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Chengdang XuDepartment of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhaoyu ZhangSchool of Software Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Anqi ZhuSchool of Software Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xixi XuInstitute of Acoustics, School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jing PanInstitute of Acoustics, School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Ying LiuDepartment of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Denglong WuDepartment of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shengsong HuangDepartment of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qian ChengInstitute of Acoustics, School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Tongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoacoustic spectroscopy can generate abundant chemical and physical information about biological tissues. However, this abundance of information makes it difficult to compare these tissues directly. Data mining methods can circumvent this problem. We describe the application of machine-learning methods (including unsupervised hierarchical clustering and supervised classification) to the diagnosis of prostate cancer by photoacoustic spectrum analysis. We focus on the content and distribution of hemoglobin, collagen, and lipids, because these molecules change during the development of prostate cancer. A higher correlation among the ultrasonic power spectra of these chemical components is observed in cancerous than in normal tissues, indicating that the microstructural distributions in cancerous tissues are more consistent. Different classifiers applied in cancer-tissue diagnoses achieved an accuracy of 82 % (better than that of standard clinical methods). The technique thus exhibits great potential for painless early diagnosis of aggressive prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Machine learningPhotoacoustic physio-chemical analysisProstate cancerSupervised classificationUnsupervised hierarchical clustering

Identifiers

PMID34168956
PMCPMC8209684
OpenAlexW3166216741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.