ArticleCurrent pharmacology reports2019
Methods to Predict Volume of Distribution.
Article in Current pharmacology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction variability in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of tissue disposition under deep uncertainty.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Biological and Teratogenic Evaluations of Nitrogen Heterocycles for Anticancer Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Silver Dimolybdate Nanorods: In Vitro Anticancer Activity Against Breast and Prostate Tumors and In Vivo Pharmacological Insights.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of small molecules: How much progress have we made?Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2025Review
- The interplay between retinoic acid binding proteins and retinoic acid degrading enzymes in modulating retinoic acid concentrations.Current topics in developmental biology · 2025Review
- Leveraging machine learning models in evaluating ADMET properties for drug discovery and development.ADMET & DMPK · 2025Review
- Predicting Pharmacokinetics of Active Constituents inPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Inter-Species Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Scaling for Drug Repurposing of Pyronaridine and Artesunate.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Molecular docking of antidiabetic molecules of libas (In silico pharmacology · 2024Article
- Screening of Prospective Antiallergic Compound as FcεRI Inhibitors and Its Antiallergic Efficacy Through Immunoinformatics Approaches.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Article
- Unlocking Benzosampangine's Potential: A Computational Approach to Investigating, Its Role as a PD-L1 Inhibitor in Tumor Immune Evasion via Molecular Docking, Dynamic Simulation, and ADMET Profiling.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewPrior to human studies, knowledge of drug disposition in the body is useful to inform decisions on drug safety and efficacy, first in human dosing, and dosing regimen design. It is therefore of interest to develop predictive models for primary pharmacokinetic parameters, clearance, and volume of distribution. The volume of distribution of a drug is determined by the physiological properties of the body and physiochemical properties of the drug, and is used to determine secondary parameters, including the half-life. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of current methods for the prediction of volume of distribution of drugs, discuss a comparison between the methods, and identify deficiencies in current predictive methods for future improvement. RECENT
findingsSeveral volumes of distribution prediction methods are discussed, including preclinical extrapolation, physiological methods, tissue composition-based models to predict tissue:plasma partition coefficients, and quantitative structure-activity relationships. Key factors that impact the prediction of volume of distribution, such as permeability, transport, and accuracy of experimental inputs, are discussed. A comparison of current methods indicates that in general, all methods predict drug volume of distribution with an absolute average fold error of 2-fold. Currently, the use of composition-based PBPK models is preferred to models requiring in vivo input. SUMMARY: Composition-based models perfusion-limited PBPK models are commonly used at present for prediction of tissue:plasma partition coefficients and volume of distribution, respectively. A better mechanistic understanding of important drug distribution processes will result in improvements in all modeling approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.