Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34168926›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Reduction of Post-Operative Split-Thickness Skin Graft Loss and Hematoma Formation: A Meta-Analysis.

Anshika Tyagi, Apurv Gupta, Vicente I Martires Iii, Moises Romo, Ishan Garg, Diego Tapia, Paola Gudino, Sinyun Lam

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Anshika TyagiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, IND.
Apurv GuptaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, IND.
Vicente I Martires IiiDepartment of Surgery, University of Santo Tomas Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Manila, PHL.
Moises RomoDepartment of Medicine and Nutrition, University of Guanajuato, Leon, MEX.
Ishan GargDepartment of Medicine, Ross University School of Medicine, Bridgetown, BRB.
Diego TapiaFaculty of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Quito, ECU.
Paola GudinoFaculty of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Quito, ECU.
Sinyun LamDepartment of Family Medicine, Aviva Health, Roseburg, USA.
Maulana Azad Medical College · INPontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador · ECRoss University School of Medicine · BBUniversidad de Guanajuato · MXUniversity of Santo Tomas · PHVA Roseburg Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Split-thickness skin grafting is a very popular technique of wound closure, especially for large wounds. The success rate of a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) has consistently been in the range of 70-90%. Multiple techniques have been introduced to further improve graft survival, for example, the use of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP), thrombin gel, platelet-rich fibrin matrix, and negative pressure wound therapy. We evaluated the impact of PRP use on the survival of STSG through a meta-analysis. We conducted the analysis in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol and performed a literature search using the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. A total of 126 articles were yielded by the search, out of which four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included according to our eligibility criteria and irrelevant articles were excluded. The intervention group received PRP application to the wound bed before applying the graft while the control group received treatment with conventional fixation procedures (sutures and staples). We estimated the pooled odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The total number of participants in the analysis was 460. The participants had wounds of varying etiology. Post-operative graft loss and hematoma formation were taken to be the primary and secondary outcome measures, respectively. Thirty-four participants suffered graft loss of differing extent in the control group while three participants suffered graft loss in the intervention group. The pooled odds ratio for graft loss was 0.15 (95% CI: 0.05-0.49; I

Indexed as

graft recipient bed preparationplatelet-rich plasma/prpsplit-thickness skin graftwound reconstructionwound repair

Identifiers

PMID34168926
PMCPMC8215306
OpenAlexW3165029322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.