Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34168880›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2020

Diving deep into trouble: the role of foraging strategy and morphology in adapting to a changing environment.

Monique Ladds, David Rosen, Carling Gerlinsky, David Slip, Robert Harcourt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Monique LaddsMarine Ecosystems Team, Department of Conservation, Wellington 6011, New Zealand.
David RosenMarine Mammal Research Unit, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Carling GerlinskyMarine Mammal Research Unit, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada.
David SlipMarine Predator Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde 2113, Australia.
Robert HarcourtMarine Predator Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde 2113, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiology places constraints on an animal's ability to forage and those unable to adapt to changing conditions may face increased challenges to reproduce and survive. As the global marine environment continues to change, small, air-breathing, endothermic marine predators such as otariids (fur seals and sea lions) and particularly females, who are constrained by central place foraging during breeding, may experience increased difficulties in successfully obtaining adequate food resources. We explored whether physiological limits of female otariids may be innately related to body morphology (fur seals vs sea lions) and/or dictate foraging strategies (epipelagic vs mesopelagic or benthic). We conducted a systematic review of the increased body of literature since the original reviews of Costa

Indexed as

aerobic dive limitdivingmeta-analysisOtariidprey availability

Identifiers

PMID34168880
PMCPMC8218901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.