Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34168811›Full record

ArticleChemical science2021

Effects of applied voltage on water at a gold electrode interface from

Zachary K Goldsmith, Marcos F Calegari Andrade, Annabella Selloni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Electrotunable Kapitza Resistance at Electrode-Water Interfaces: The Importance of Electrode Metallicity.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Electronic Response and Charge Inversion at Polarized Gold Electrode.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dielectric Properties of Nanoconfined Water fromJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Probing the electronic properties of the electrified silicon/water interface by combining simulations and experiments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zachary K GoldsmithDepartment of Chemistry, Princeton University Princeton NJ 08544 USA zkg@princeton.edu aselloni@princeton.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5556-4079
Marcos F Calegari AndradeDepartment of Chemistry, Princeton University Princeton NJ 08544 USA zkg@princeton.edu aselloni@princeton.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8630-7393
Annabella SelloniDepartment of Chemistry, Princeton University Princeton NJ 08544 USA zkg@princeton.edu aselloni@princeton.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5896-3158

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrode-water interfaces under voltage bias demonstrate anomalous electrostatic and structural properties that are influential in their catalytic and technological applications. Mean-field and empirical models of the electrical double layer (EDL) that forms in response to an applied potential do not capture the heterogeneity that polarizable, liquid-phase water molecules engender. To illustrate the inhomogeneous nature of the electrochemical interface, Born-Oppenheimer

Identifiers

PMID34168811
PMCPMC8179682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.