Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34168703›Full record

ArticleJournal of human kinetics2021

Repeated Sprint Ability in Elite Basketball Players: The Effects of 10 × 30 m Vs. 20 × 15 m Exercise Protocols on Physiological Variables and Sprint Performance.

Bruno Figueira, Bruno Gonçalves, Eduardo Abade, Rūtenis Paulauskas, Nerijus Masiulis, Paulius Kamarauskas, Jaime Sampaio

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Bruno FigueiraFaculty of Sport Biomedicine, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Bruno GonçalvesDepartamento de Desporto e Saúde, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Eduardo AbadeResearch Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, CreativeLab Research Community, Kaunas Portugal.
Rūtenis PaulauskasFaculty of Sport Biomedicine, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Nerijus MasiulisFaculty of Sport Biomedicine, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Paulius KamarauskasFaculty of Sport Biomedicine, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Jaime SampaioResearch Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, CreativeLab Research Community, Kaunas Portugal.
Lithuanian Sports University · LTInstituto Superior da Maia · PTUniversity of Évora · PTUniversity of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro · PTVytautas Magnus University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Team sports players are required to perform repeated bouts of short-term high-intensity actions during the games. The present study aimed to examine the effects of a novel repeated sprint ability protocol (20×15 m) and compare it with the impact of a more traditional repeated sprint ability protocol (10×30 m). Twelve male elite Lithuanian basketball players (age 21.0 ± 2.0 y, body height 1.90 ± 0,07 m, body mass 86.2 ± 5.8 kg and training experience 12.0 ± 1.9 y) competing in the Lithuanian National Basketball Championship participated in this study. Participants completed three bouts of each repeated sprint protocol interspersed with 5 minutes of recovery. Results showed that the 20×15 m protocol caused a significant decrease in total sprint time (most likely; mean changes (%) with ± 90% of confidence limits, -9.4%; ± 0.7%) and a large decrease in blood lactate (most likely, -39.2%; ±12.8%) compared to the 10×30 m protocol. Despite small differences, the fatigue index presented a similar trend (possibly decrease, -23.7%; ± 38.8%). The exercise heart rate showed a very similar trend with trivial differences between the two protocols. The 20×15 m protocol presented a lower heart rate during recovery with small magnitude. Overall, the present study showed that the 20×15 m protocol seemed to be more representative of the specific basketball demands. Coaches should be aware that RSA training during the in-season may be an adequate stimulus to improve high-intensity runs and muscle power in high-level players.

Indexed as

exercise metabolismshuttle runningsport-specific conditioningteam sportstraining

Identifiers

PMID34168703
PMCPMC8008292
OpenAlexW3152792189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.