Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34168546›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2021

Localization of the Epileptogenic Zone by Multimodal Neuroimaging and High-Frequency Oscillation.

Xiaonan Li, Tao Yu, Zhiwei Ren, Xueyuan Wang, Jiaqing Yan, Xin Chen, Xiaoming Yan, Wei Wang, Yue Xing, Xianchang Zhang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Networks through the lens of high-frequency oscillations.Frontiers in network physiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xiaonan LiLaboratory of Brain Disorders, Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Disorders, Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tao YuXuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhiwei RenXuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xueyuan WangXuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jiaqing YanCollege of Electrical and Control Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Xin ChenXuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoming YanXuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wei WangLaboratory of Brain Disorders, Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Disorders, Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yue XingLaboratory of Brain Disorders, Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Disorders, Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xianchang ZhangMR Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Beijing, China.
Herui ZhangBioland Laboratory, Guangzhou, China.
Horace H LohBioland Laboratory, Guangzhou, China.
Guojun ZhangXuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaofeng YangLaboratory of Brain Disorders, Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Disorders, Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate localization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) is a key factor to obtain good surgical outcome for refractory epilepsy patients. However, no technique, so far, can precisely locate the EZ, and there are barely any reports on the combined application of multiple technologies to improve the localization accuracy of the EZ. In this study, we aimed to explore the use of a multimodal method combining PET-MRI, fluid and white matter suppression (FLAWS)-a novel MRI sequence, and high-frequency oscillation (HFO) automated analysis to delineate EZ. We retrospectively collected 15 patients with refractory epilepsy who underwent surgery and used the above three methods to detect abnormal brain areas of all patients. We compared the PET-MRI, FLAWS, and HFO results with traditional methods to evaluate their diagnostic value. The sensitivities, specificities of locating the EZ, and marking extent removed versus not removed [RatioChann(ev)] of each method were compared with surgical outcome. We also tested the possibility of using different combinations to locate the EZ. The marked areas in every patient established using each method were also compared to determine the correlations among the three methods. The results showed that PET-MRI, FLAWS, and HFOs can provide more information about potential epileptic areas than traditional methods. When detecting the EZs, the sensitivities of PET-MRI, FLAWS, and HFOs were 68.75, 53.85, and 87.50%, and the specificities were 80.00, 33.33, and 100.00%. The RatioChann(ev) of HFO-marked contacts was significantly higher in patients with good outcome than those with poor outcome (

Indexed as

epileptogenic zoneFLAWShigh-frequency oscillationsmultimodal methodneuroimagingPET-MRI

Identifiers

PMID34168546
PMCPMC8217465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.