Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34168461›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2021

Progesterone Receptor Together with PKCα Expression as Prognostic Factors for Astrocytomas Malignancy.

Denisse Arcos-Montoya, Talia Wegman-Ostrosky, Sonia Mejía-Pérez, Marisol De la Fuente-Granada, Ignacio Camacho-Arroyo, Alejandro García-Carrancá, Marco A Velasco-Velázquez, Joaquín Manjarrez-Marmolejo, Aliesha González-Arenas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Effects of progesterone on T-type-CaNeural regeneration research · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. LPACells · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Denisse Arcos-MontoyaDepartamento de Medicina Genómica y Toxicología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-6509-7662
Talia Wegman-OstroskyDirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional Cancerología, Ciudad de México, México.
Sonia Mejía-PérezSubdirección de Neurocirugía, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-5929-6761
Marisol De la Fuente-GranadaDepartamento de Medicina Genómica y Toxicología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Ignacio Camacho-ArroyoUnidad de Investigación en Reproducción Humana, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología-Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Alejandro García-CarrancáUnidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México e Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0003-1220-5014
Marco A Velasco-VelázquezDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0001-9717-0265
Joaquín Manjarrez-MarmolejoLaboratorio de Fisiología de la Formación Reticular, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Ciudad de México, México.
Aliesha González-ArenasDepartamento de Medicina Genómica y Toxicología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-9506-3180
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXInstituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía · MXInstituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXInstituto Nacional de Perinatología · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAstrocytomas are the most common and aggressive primary brain tumors, and they are classified according to the degree of malignancy on a scale of I to IV, in which grade I is the least malignant and grade IV the highest. Many factors are related to astrocytomas progression as progesterone receptor (PR), whose transcriptional activity could be regulated by phosphorylation by protein kinase C alpha (PKCα) at the residue Ser400. Our aim was to investigate if PR phosphorylation together with PKCα expression could be used as a prognostic factor for astrocytomas malignancy.

methodsBy immunofluorescence, we detected the content of PKCα, PR and its phosphorylation at Ser400 in 46 biopsies from Mexican patients with different astrocytoma malignancy grades; by bioinformatic tools using TCGA data, we evaluated the expression of PR and PKCα mRNA according to astrocytoma malignancy grades. For all statistical analyses, significance was p<0.05.

resultsWe detected a positive correlation between the tumor grade and the content of PKCα, PR and its phosphorylation at Ser400, as well as the intracellular colocalization of these proteins. Interestingly, using an in silico assay, we found that the PR and PKCα expression at mRNA level has an inverse ratio with astrocytomas tumor grade. DISCUSSION: These results indicate that PR and its phosphorylation at Ser400 site, as well as PKCα and their colocalization, could be considered as possible malignancy biomarkers for astrocytomas grades I-IV.

Indexed as

astrocytomabiomarkerglioblastomaprogesterone receptorprotein kinase C alpha

Identifiers

PMID34168461
PMCPMC8217595
OpenAlexW3166280230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.