Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34168438›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2021

Understanding the Influences of COPD Patient's Capability on the Uptake of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in the UK Through an Inclusive Design Approach.

Yuanyuan Liu, Terry Dickerson, Frances Early, Jonathan Fuld, Chen Jiang, P John Clarkson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Equity in pulmonary rehabilitation delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuanyuan LiuDepartment of Industrial Design, School of Mechanical Engineering & Automation, Beihang University, 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Terry DickersonEngineering Design Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6902-9504
Frances EarlyCentre for Self Management Support, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus Department of Respiratory Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8499-197X
Jonathan FuldCentre for Self Management Support, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus Department of Respiratory Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1847-184X
Chen JiangDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Clifford Allbutt Building, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, UK.
P John ClarksonEngineering Design Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended for patients with COPD to improve their symptoms and quality of life. However, in the UK, only one in ten of those who need PR receive it and this might be inaccessible to people with disabilities. This study aims to inform improvements to PR service by identifying barriers to the uptake of PR in the COPD care journey in relation to patients' capabilities that can affect their access to PR. Methods: An Inclusive Design approach with mixed methods was undertaken. Firstly, patients and healthcare professionals were interviewed to gather insight into their experiences of COPD care and map patients' care journey. Secondly, an Exclusion Calculator was used to estimate service demand on patients' capability and the proportion of population excluded from the service. Thirdly, a framework analysis was applied to guide data analysis to identify the challenges of accessing PR. Finally, proposed recommendations were refined with patients and healthcare professionals. Results: The overall capability-related exclusion number was very high (62.5%), and exclusion caused by limited mobility was the highest (50%) among the interviewees and even higher based on the population database. This suggests the importance of considering COPD patients' capability-related needs to improve their access to care. Capability-related challenges for patients accessing PR such as poor mobility to transport and low vision impairing ability to read inhaler instructions were identified, as well as non-capability-related challenges such as patients' perception about COPD and inability to access proper information. Recommendations were proposed to help patients to self-manage their COPD and access to PR. Conclusion: Lack of attention to COPD patients' capability level in the delivery of PR may affect its uptake. Considering the capability-related needs of COPD patients and providing patients with reassurance, information, and support on their care journey could improve the uptake of PR.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeHumansUnited Kingdomcapabilitycare journeyCOPDhealthcare accessInclusive Designpulmonary rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34168438
PMCPMC8217842
OpenAlexW3166573202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.