ReviewLeukemia2021
Measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: expert review and consensus recommendations.
Review in Leukemia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- A phase 1/2 study of duvelisib plus venetoclax in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL or Richter transformation.Blood advances · 2026Trial
- Re-emergence of circulating non-malignant B cells as a prognostic biomarker in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Long-term follow-up of MRD-guided ibrutinib plus venetoclax in relapsed CLL: phase 2 VISION/HO141 trial.Blood advances · 2025Trial
- Influence of polyfunctional TbetFrontiers in immunology · 2025Trial
- A fixed-duration immunochemotherapy approach in CLL: 5.5-year results from the phase 2 ICLL-07 FILO trial.Blood advances · 2023Trial
- Acalabrutinib and high-frequency low-dose subcutaneous rituximab for initial therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Blood advances · 2023Trial
- Minimal residual disease-guided ibrutinib and venetoclax in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and complex karyotype.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- From Time-Limited Therapy to Treatment-Free Observation: The Evolving Role of MRD in CLL Management.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Surrogate Endpoints in CLL: From Promise and Pitfalls to a Context-Specific Validation Framework.Hematology reports · 2026Review
- Measurable residual disease after venetoclax treatment for relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Japan.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
- [Long-term outcomes of first-line iFCR regimen in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma and the role of MRD].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
- Chromosome Karyotyping in Hematological Malignancies: Current Status and Future Directions.Current medical science · 2026Review
- The role of MRD monitoring and options for CLL management in relapsed/refractory disease.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- Minimal residual disease status predicts outcomes in patients with follicular lymphoma treated with chemoimmunotherapy on the SWOG S0016 trial.Haematologica · 2025Article
- The Impact of Minimal Residual Disease Measurement in the Management of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Cancers · 2025Review
- Measurable Residual Disease Testing Following Nonintensive Chemoimmunotherapy is Predictive of Need for Maintenance Therapy in Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Wisconsin Oncology Network Study.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2025Article
- Inferior Outcomes of Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Rituximab Chemotherapy in Korean Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients with Concurrent Thrombocytopenia and Anemia.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Review
- Recent Advances in the Molecular Biology of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: How to Define Prognosis and Guide Treatment.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 19 institutions in 17 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessment of measurable residual disease (often referred to as "minimal residual disease") has emerged as a highly sensitive indicator of disease burden during and at the end of treatment and has been correlated with time-to-event outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Undetectable-measurable residual disease status at the end of treatment demonstrated independent prognostic significance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, correlating with favorable progression-free and overall survival with chemoimmunotherapy. Given its utility in evaluating depth of response, determining measurable residual disease status is now a focus of outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia clinical trials. Increased adoption of measurable residual disease assessment calls for standards for nomenclature and outcomes data reporting. In addition, many basic questions have not been systematically addressed. Here, we present the work of an international, multidisciplinary, 174-member panel convened to identify critical questions on key issues pertaining to measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, review evaluable data, develop unified answers in conjunction with local expert input, and provide recommendations for future studies. Recommendations are presented regarding methodology for measurable residual disease determination, assay requirements and in which tissue to assess measurable residual disease, timing and frequency of assessment, use of measurable residual disease in clinical practice versus clinical trials, and the future usefulness of measurable residual disease assessment. Nomenclature is also proposed. Adoption of these recommendations will work toward standardizing data acquisition and interpretation in future studies with new treatments with the ultimate objective of improving outcomes and curing chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.