Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34168283›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2021

Measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: expert review and consensus recommendations.

William G Wierda, Andrew Rawstron, Florence Cymbalista, Xavier Badoux, Davide Rossi, Jennifer R Brown, Alexander Egle, Virginia Abello, Eduardo Cervera Ceballos, Yair Herishanu and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Influence of polyfunctional TbetFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The role of MRD monitoring and options for CLL management in relapsed/refractory disease.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 19 institutions in 17 countries.

William G WierdaMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. wwierda@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7357-270X
Andrew RawstronHaematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds, UK.
Florence CymbalistaHôpital Avicenne, AP-HP, UMR Université Paris13/INSERM U978, Bobigny, France.
Xavier BadouxThe St. George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Davide RossiHematology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Jennifer R BrownDana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2040-4961
Alexander EgleDepartment of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Hemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0648-4416
Virginia AbelloHospital de San José, Bogota, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6507-4041
Eduardo Cervera CeballosInstituto Nacional de Cancerologia/Médica Sur Fundación Clínica, Mexico City, Mexico.
Yair HerishanuTel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Stephen P MulliganRoyal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Carsten U NiemannRigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9880-5242
Colin P DiongParkway Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Teoman SoysalCerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7417-2118
Ritsuro SuzukiShimane University Hospital, Shimane, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5974-7614
Hoa T T TranAkerhus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Shang-Ju WuNational Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Carolyn OwenTom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Stephan StilgenbauerInternal Medicine III, Ulm University, Ulm and Internal Medicine 1, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Paolo GhiaUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele and IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3750-7342
Peter HillmenLeeds Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Akershus University Hospital · NOHarvard University · USHospital Universitario Infantil San José · COInserm · FRInstitute of Oncology Research · CHInstituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TRLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWParacelsus Medical University · ATRigshospitalet · DKRoyal North Shore Hospital · AUSaarland University · DEShimane University Hospital · JPSt George Hospital · AUTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · ILThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of measurable residual disease (often referred to as "minimal residual disease") has emerged as a highly sensitive indicator of disease burden during and at the end of treatment and has been correlated with time-to-event outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Undetectable-measurable residual disease status at the end of treatment demonstrated independent prognostic significance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, correlating with favorable progression-free and overall survival with chemoimmunotherapy. Given its utility in evaluating depth of response, determining measurable residual disease status is now a focus of outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia clinical trials. Increased adoption of measurable residual disease assessment calls for standards for nomenclature and outcomes data reporting. In addition, many basic questions have not been systematically addressed. Here, we present the work of an international, multidisciplinary, 174-member panel convened to identify critical questions on key issues pertaining to measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, review evaluable data, develop unified answers in conjunction with local expert input, and provide recommendations for future studies. Recommendations are presented regarding methodology for measurable residual disease determination, assay requirements and in which tissue to assess measurable residual disease, timing and frequency of assessment, use of measurable residual disease in clinical practice versus clinical trials, and the future usefulness of measurable residual disease assessment. Nomenclature is also proposed. Adoption of these recommendations will work toward standardizing data acquisition and interpretation in future studies with new treatments with the ultimate objective of improving outcomes and curing chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Indexed as

HumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellNeoplasm, ResidualPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID34168283
PMCPMC8550962
OpenAlexW3174297273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.