Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34168175›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Can wood-decaying urban macrofungi be identified by using fuzzy interference system? An example in Central European Ganoderma species.

Alžbeta Michalíková, Terézia Beck, Ján Gáper, Peter Pristaš, Svetlana Gáperová

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alžbeta MichalíkováDepartment of Computer Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University, 97401, Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic. alzbeta.michalikova@umb.sk.ORCID 0000-0002-0568-9279
Terézia BeckDepartment of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University, 97401, Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic.
Ján GáperDepartment of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, 96001, Zvolen, Slovak Republic.
Peter PristašInstitute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Šrobárova 2, 04001, Košice, Slovak Republic.
Svetlana GáperováDepartment of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University, 97401, Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic.
Matej Bel University · SKUniversity of Ostrava · CZUniversity of Pavol Jozef Šafárik · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ganoderma is a cosmopolitan genus of wood-decaying basidiomycetous macrofungi that can rot the roots and/or lower trunk. Among the standing trees, their presence often indicates that a hazard assessment may be necessary. These bracket fungi are commonly known for the crust-like upper surfaces of their basidiocarps and formation of white rot. Six species occur in central European urban habitats. Several of them, such as Ganoderma adspersum, G. applanatum, G. resinaceum and G. pfeifferi, are most hazardous fungi causing extensive horizontal stem decay in urban trees. Therefore, their early identification is crucial for correct management of trees. In this paper, a fast technique is tested for the determination of phytopathologically important urban macrofungi using fuzzy interference system of Sugeno type based on 13 selected traits of 72 basidiocarps of six Ganoderma species and compared to the ITS sequence based determination. Basidiocarps features were processed for the following situations: At first, the FIS of Sugeno 2 type (without basidiospore sizes) was used and 57 Ganoderma basidiocarps (79.17%) were correctly determined. Determination success increased to 96.61% after selecting basidiocarps with critical values (15 basidiocarps). These undeterminable basidiocarps must be analyzed by molecular methods. In a case, that basidiospore sizes of some basidiocarps were known, a combination of Sugeno 1 (31 basidiocarps with known basidiospore size) and Sugeno 2 (41 basidiocarps with unknown basidiospore size) was used. 84.72% of Ganoderma basidiocarps were correctly identified. Determination success increased to 96.83% after selecting basidiocarps with critical values (11 basidiocarps).

Indexed as

Fruiting Bodies, FungalFungiGanodermaSpores, FungalTreesWood

Identifiers

PMID34168175
PMCPMC8225830
OpenAlexW3176050012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.