ArticleScientific reports2021
Analysing Twitter semantic networks: the case of 2018 Italian elections.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging content producer networks and user perception to detect online discursive communities.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Tracking the Spread of Pollen on Social Media Using Pollen-Related Messages From Twitter: Retrospective Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Entropy-based detection of Twitter echo chambers.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Patterns of human and bots behaviour on Twitter conversations about sustainability.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Emotional profiling and cognitive networks unravel how mainstream and alternative press framed AstraZeneca, Pfizer and COVID-19 vaccination campaigns.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Bow-tie structures of twitter discursive communities.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- On the development of an information system for monitoring user opinion and its role for the public.Journal of big data · 2022Article
- Maximum entropy networks for large scale social network node analysis.Applied network science · 2022Article
- Italian Twitter semantic network during the Covid-19 epidemic.EPJ data science · 2021Article
- Networked partisanship and framing: A socio-semantic network analysis of the Italian debate on migration.PloS one · 2021Article
- Flow of online misinformation during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.EPJ data science · 2021Article
- Exploring the effect of streamed social media data variations on social network analysis.Social network analysis and mining · 2021Article
- Amplifying influence through coordinated behaviour in social networks.Social network analysis and mining · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social media play a key role in shaping citizens' political opinion. According to the Eurobarometer, the percentage of EU citizens employing online social networks on a daily basis has increased from 18% in 2010 to 48% in 2019. The entwinement between social media and the unfolding of political dynamics has motivated the interest of researchers for the analysis of users online behavior-with particular emphasis on group polarization during debates and echo-chambers formation. In this context, semantic aspects have remained largely under-explored. In this paper, we aim at filling this gap by adopting a two-steps approach. First, we identify the discursive communities animating the political debate in the run up of the 2018 Italian Elections as groups of users with a significantly-similar retweeting behavior. Second, we study the mechanisms that shape their internal discussions by monitoring, on a daily basis, the structural evolution of the semantic networks they induce. Above and beyond specifying the semantic peculiarities of the Italian electoral competition, our approach innovates studies of online political discussions in two main ways. On the one hand, it grounds semantic analysis within users' behaviors by implementing a method, rooted in statistical theory, that guarantees that our inference of socio-semantic structures is not biased by any unsupported assumption about missing information; on the other, it is completely automated as it does not rest upon any manual labelling (either based on the users' features or on their sharing patterns). These elements make our method applicable to any Twitter discussion regardless of the language or the topic addressed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.