ArticleBMJ case reports2021
Atypical presentation of allergic interstitial nephritis likely induced by ciprofloxacin.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Though the prevalence of drug induced allergic interstitial nephritis (AIN) appears to be increasing, the diagnostic and treatment strategies still remain vague. We present a 56-year-old man with a history of hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage IIIa, recent exposure to ciprofloxacin who presented with acute kidney injury. Though the suspicion of AIN was high, his urinary sediment was bland, that is, no leucocytes or leucocyte casts. A renal biopsy subsequently showed features of AIN correlating with a resolving phase of inflammation. Given the resolving nature of the pathology, we chose not to complete a course of corticosteroids despite his need for temporary haemodialysis. He was able to fully recover his renal function. In this report, we emphasise the unreliable nature of the urinary sediment in the diagnosis of AIN, the utility of a renal biopsy in helping to guide treatment, and the controversial data in corticosteroid treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.