Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34167544›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2021

Development and validity assessment of a Japanese version of the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale in participants with musculoskeletal disorders.

Hiroshi Takasaki, Shota Kawazoe, Takahiro Miki, Hiroki Chiba, Emma Godfrey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hiroshi TakasakiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Saitama Prefectural University, Sannomiya 820, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8540, Japan. physical.therapy.takasaki@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3699-2294
Shota KawazoeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Saitama Prefectural University, Sannomiya 820, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8540, Japan.
Takahiro MikiGraduate School of Rehabilitation Science, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya, Japan.
Hiroki ChibaGraduate School of Rehabilitation Science, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya, Japan.
Emma GodfreyDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience and Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Saitama Prefectural University · JPKing's College London · GB

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19K19912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExercise adherence is important for achieving a long-term effect from musculoskeletal management. The Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS), which was developed in 2017 as a patient reported outcome measure to assess exercise adherence in those with chronic low back pain in the UK, has demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability and is a robust measure of exercise adherence. This study aimed to undertake cross-cultural adaptation of the EARS into Japanese and investigate its structural validity in participants with musculoskeletal disorders.

methodsThe current study was composed of two phases, where a provisional Japanese version of the EARS was developed employing an international guideline for cross-cultural adaptation (Phase A), and structural validity was then evaluated using the Rasch analysis (Phase B). Participants with musculoskeletal disorders who have individualized home exercises prescribed by a physical therapist were recruited.

resultsIn Phase A, the pilot testing was conducted twice because the initial testing detected some uncertainty revealed in comments from 17 participants (5 males and 12 females, 18-79 years of age) about which activities and exercises were supposed to be included. We therefore modified the draft by identifying a person who prescribed/recommended activities and exercises as per the Working Alliance Inventory. The second pilot testing using this draft recruited 30 participants (6 males and 24 females, 18-79 years of age), who provided no further comments, demonstrating the Japanese version of the EARS (EARS-J) had been successfully developed. In Phase B, data from 200 participants who completed the EARS-J (63 males and 127 females, mean ± SD of age = 53.6 ± 17.0) were analyzed using the Andrich's Rating Scale Model. Rasch statics indicated unidimensionality of the six items of the EARS-J. The Cronbach α was 0.77. Substantial ceiling effect (21.0%) was observed, with no floor effect (0.5%).

conclusionsA Japanese version of the EARS has been developed, which demonstrated acceptable structural validity with the evidence of unidimensionality in the Rasch analysis in Japanese people with musculoskeletal disorders who were prescribed individualized home exercises. However, there was a substantial ceiling effect and further studies are required to comprehensively establish validity and reliability of the EARS-J.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyPatient ComplianceAdultAgedFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsTranslationsAdherenceComplianceConstruct validityCross-cultural adaptationPhysiotherapyPrescribed exerciseRasch analysisTranslation

Identifiers

PMID34167544
PMCPMC8223386
OpenAlexW3175936443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.