ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2021
Development and validity assessment of a Japanese version of the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale in participants with musculoskeletal disorders.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparisons of approaches to pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Assessment of Home Exercise Adherence in Patients with Non-Surgical Post-Traumatic Neck Pain: A Study Protocol Using the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Profiles of exercise adherence in late pregnancy: a latent profile analysis among Chinese women.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Chinese Version of the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS) in Older Patients with Urinary Incontinence After Prostate Cancer Surgery.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Contributors to Adherence to Exercise Therapy in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Research.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cross-cultural adaption of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) into Punjabi for knee injury and osteoarthritis patients in Canada.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and test-retest reliability assessment of a Swedish version of the exercise adherence rating scale in patients after shoulder surgery.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Predictors of 1-Year Perceived Recovery, Absenteeism, and Expenses Due to Low Back Pain in Workers Receiving Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The challenge of exercise (non-)adherence: a scoping review of methods and techniques applied to improve adherence to physical activity and exercise in people with inflammatory arthritis.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2023Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation of the Satisfaction and Recovery Index among Japanese people with musculoskeletal disorders.Journal of physical therapy science · 2022Article
- Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Kannada Version of the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS-Kn) Among Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) Survivors in a Tertiary Care Setup in India.Integrative cancer therapiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExercise adherence is important for achieving a long-term effect from musculoskeletal management. The Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS), which was developed in 2017 as a patient reported outcome measure to assess exercise adherence in those with chronic low back pain in the UK, has demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability and is a robust measure of exercise adherence. This study aimed to undertake cross-cultural adaptation of the EARS into Japanese and investigate its structural validity in participants with musculoskeletal disorders.
methodsThe current study was composed of two phases, where a provisional Japanese version of the EARS was developed employing an international guideline for cross-cultural adaptation (Phase A), and structural validity was then evaluated using the Rasch analysis (Phase B). Participants with musculoskeletal disorders who have individualized home exercises prescribed by a physical therapist were recruited.
resultsIn Phase A, the pilot testing was conducted twice because the initial testing detected some uncertainty revealed in comments from 17 participants (5 males and 12 females, 18-79 years of age) about which activities and exercises were supposed to be included. We therefore modified the draft by identifying a person who prescribed/recommended activities and exercises as per the Working Alliance Inventory. The second pilot testing using this draft recruited 30 participants (6 males and 24 females, 18-79 years of age), who provided no further comments, demonstrating the Japanese version of the EARS (EARS-J) had been successfully developed. In Phase B, data from 200 participants who completed the EARS-J (63 males and 127 females, mean ± SD of age = 53.6 ± 17.0) were analyzed using the Andrich's Rating Scale Model. Rasch statics indicated unidimensionality of the six items of the EARS-J. The Cronbach α was 0.77. Substantial ceiling effect (21.0%) was observed, with no floor effect (0.5%).
conclusionsA Japanese version of the EARS has been developed, which demonstrated acceptable structural validity with the evidence of unidimensionality in the Rasch analysis in Japanese people with musculoskeletal disorders who were prescribed individualized home exercises. However, there was a substantial ceiling effect and further studies are required to comprehensively establish validity and reliability of the EARS-J.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.