Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34167534›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

Exploring the status of and demand for palliative day-care clinics and day hospices in Germany: a protocol for a mixed-methods study.

Franziska A Herbst, Stephanie Stiel, Kathrin Damm, Lea de Jong, Jona T Stahmeyer, Nils Schneider

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Franziska A Herbst *Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. herbst.franziska@mh-hannover.de.
Stephanie Stiel *Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Kathrin DammCenter for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University Hannover, Otto-Brenner-Straße 7, 30159, Hannover, Germany.
Lea de JongCenter for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University Hannover, Otto-Brenner-Straße 7, 30159, Hannover, Germany.
Jona T StahmeyerHealth Services Research Unit, AOK Niedersachsen, Hildesheimer Straße 273, 30519, Hannover, Germany.
Nils SchneiderInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

Innovation Fund of the German Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) 01VSF19034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, the establishment and development of palliative day-care clinics and day hospices in Germany have been completely unsystematic. Research is needed to gain insight into these services and to ensure their accessibility and quality. Accordingly, the ABPATITE research project aims at: (1) identifying the characteristics of palliative day-care clinics and day hospices in Germany, (2) determining demand and preferences for these services, and (3) proposing recommendations (with expert agreement) for the needs-based establishment and development of these services.

methodsThe research is a multi-perspective, prospective, observational study following a mixed-methods approach across three study phases. In phase 1a, qualitative expert interviews will be conducted to capture the facility-related characteristics of palliative day-care clinics and day hospices in Germany; the results will feed into a questionnaire sent to all such institutions identified nationwide. In phase 1b, a questionnaire will be sent to local statutory health insurance providers, to gain insight into their contracts and accounting and remuneration models. In phase 2a, a service preference survey will be conducted with patients and family caregivers. In phase 2b, semi-structured interviews with management staff will explore the factors that promote and hinder the provision of service. In phase 2c, the external perspective will be surveyed via focus groups with local actors involved in hospice and palliative care. In phase 3a, focus groups with representatives from relevant areas will be conducted to develop recommendations. Finally, in phase 3b, recommendations will be agreed upon through a Delphi survey. DISCUSSION: The empirically developed recommendations should enable the establishment and development of day hospices and palliative day-care clinics in Germany to be better managed, more oriented to actual demand, and more effectively integrated into wider health care services. Importantly, the findings are expected to optimize the overall development of hospice and palliative care services.

trial registrationThe study was prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien) (Registration N° DRKS00021446; date of registration: April 20, 2020). The study is searchable under the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal of the World Health Organization, under the German Clinical Trials Register number.

Indexed as

Hospice CareHospicesClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicGermanyHumansObservational Studies as TopicPalliative CareProspective Studiesadult day-care centersday-care, medicalday hospiceend of life carehealth care planninghospice carepalliative carepalliative day-care clinicpatient preference

Identifiers

PMID34167534
PMCPMC8228933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.