Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34167530›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

Support received by family members before, at and after an ill person's death.

Anna O'Sullivan, Anette Alvariza, Joakim Öhlén, Cecilia Larsdotter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The quality of end-of-life care for Danish cancer patients who have received non-specialized palliative care: a national survey using the Danish version of VOICES-SF.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna O'SullivanPalliative Research Centre, Department of Healthcare Sciences, Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anette AlvarizaPalliative Research Centre, Department of Healthcare Sciences, Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College, Stockholm, Sweden.
Joakim ÖhlénCentre for Person-Centered Care, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Cecilia LarsdotterPalliative Research Centre, Department of Healthcare Sciences, Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College, Stockholm, Sweden. cecilia.larsdotter@shh.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is widely recognised, that family members are central to care of people with advanced illness, and that support should be provided to all family members in need thereof. The aim of this study was to investigate family members' experiences of support received during the last three months of life, at the time of death and after the death of a person with advanced illness.

methodsA retrospective cross-sectional survey design was employed, using the VOICES(SF) questionnaire and multiple methods for data analyses. The sample consisted of 485 bereaved family members (aged: 20-90 years old, 70% women) of people who died in hospital between August 2016-April 2017.

resultsOf the family members, 58,8% reported they had received enough help and support during the illness, whereas 30,2% had not. Family members' comments about support during the illness were mainly related to care the ill person had or had not received, rather than about support they themselves received. Of all family members, 52,8% reported having had enough support at the time of the ill person's death. Related to support at death, 14,6% reported that the imminence of death was not clear, which was described as having affected their opportunity to be with the dying person at the time of death. Of all, 25,2% had a follow-up conversation after the death, 48% did not and did not want to, and 21% had no follow-up conversation, but would have liked one. A follow-up conversation was described as helpful for the bereavement process, and disappointment was expressed when not receiving support after the death.

conclusionsFamily members' experiences of support were partly related to whether the ill person's care needs were fulfilled. Healthcare staff expressing empathy and respect in the care of dying people and their family members were important for family members' experiences of support. Family members' difficulty recognising that death was imminent and the importance of healthcare staff providing them with clear information were expressed in connection with support at death. Follow-up conversations were valued by family members, especially if with a healthcare professional who was present at the time of death.

Indexed as

BereavementTerminal CareCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyFemaleGriefHumansInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesCommunicationEnd-of-life careFamily membersInformationPalliative careSupport

Identifiers

PMID34167530
PMCPMC8228910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.