Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34167519›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Maternal and neonatal outcomes in transverse and vertical skin incision for placenta previa : Skin incision for placenta previa.

Dazhi Fan, Huishan Zhang, Jiaming Rao, Dongxin Lin, Shuzhen Wu, Pengsheng Li, Gengdong Chen, Zixing Zhou, Juan Liu, Ting Chen and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Blood Type and Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Placenta Previa.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dazhi FanFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China. fandazhigw@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2773-9166
Huishan ZhangFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China.
Jiaming RaoFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China.
Dongxin LinFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China.
Shuzhen WuDepartment of Obstetrics, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China.
Pengsheng LiFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China.
Gengdong ChenFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China.
Zixing ZhouFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China.
Juan LiuDepartment of Obstetrics, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China.
Ting ChenDepartment of Foetal Ultrasonic, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China.
Fengying ChenDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoling GuoFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China. fsguoxl@163.com.
Zhengping LiuFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China. liuzphlk81@outlook.com.
Foshan Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlacenta previa, a serious obstetric issue, should be managed by experienced teams. The safe and appropriate mode of delivery for placenta previa is by cesarean delivery. However, no studies were found comparing either maternal or neonatal outcomes for different skin incision in women with placenta previa. The aim of this study was to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes by skin incision types (transverse compared with vertical) in a large cohort of women with placenta previa who were undergoing cesarean delivery.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study carried out between January 2014 and June 2019. All pregnant women with placenta previa had confirmed by ultrasonologist before delivery and obstetrician at delivery. The primary outcome was the estimated blood loss during the surgery and within the first 24 hours postoperatively. Mean (standard deviation), median (interquartile range) or frequency (percentage) was reported to variables. Appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests were used to analyses.

resultsThe study included 1098 complete records, 332 (30.24%) cases in the vertical skin incision group and 766 (69.76%) cases in the transverse skin incision group. Those with vertical incision showed a higher percentage of preterm delivery, anterior placenta, abnormally invasive placenta, and history of previous cesarean delivery, and a lower percentage of first pregnancy, in vitro fertilization, and emergency cesarean delivery. After controlling for confounding factors, higher incidence of post-partum hemorrhage (OR 5.47, 95% CI 3.84-7.79), maternal intensive care unit (OR 4.30, 95% CI 2.86-6.45), transfusion (OR 5.97, 95% CI 4.15-8.58), and 5-min APGAR< 7 (OR 9.03, 95% CI 1.83-44.49), a more estimated blood loss (β 601.85, 95%CI 458.78-744.91), and a longer length of hospital stay after delivery (β 0.54, 95%CI 0.23-0.86) were found in the vertical skin incision group.

conclusionsOur data demonstrated that transverse skin incision group showed the better perinatal outcomes in women with placenta previa. Future collaborative studies are needed to be done by centers for placenta previa to have a better understanding of the characteristics and the outcomes of the disease in the choosing skin incision.

Indexed as

AdultBlood TransfusionCesarean SectionFemaleHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornLength of StayMalePlacenta PreviaPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthRetrospective StudiesSurgical WoundCesarean deliveryMaternal and neonatal morbidityPlacenta previaSkin incision

Identifiers

PMID34167519
PMCPMC8229347
OpenAlexW3174226462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.