Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34167359›Full record

ArticleSLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D2021

Evaluating Very Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Nucleus Segmentation from Brightfield Cell Microscopy Images.

Mohammed A S Ali, Oleg Misko, Sten-Oliver Salumaa, Mikhail Papkov, Kaupo Palo, Dmytro Fishman, Leopold Parts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammed A S AliDepartment of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-0266-4703
Oleg MiskoUkrainian Catholic University, Lviv, L'vìvs'ka, Ukraine.
Sten-Oliver SalumaaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Mikhail PapkovDepartment of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Kaupo PaloPerkinElmer Cellular Technologies Germany GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Dmytro FishmanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Leopold PartsDepartment of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in microscopy have increased output data volumes, and powerful image analysis methods are required to match. In particular, finding and characterizing nuclei from microscopy images, a core cytometry task, remains difficult to automate. While deep learning models have given encouraging results on this problem, the most powerful approaches have not yet been tested for attacking it. Here, we review and evaluate state-of-the-art very deep convolutional neural network architectures and training strategies for segmenting nuclei from brightfield cell images. We tested U-Net as a baseline model; considered U-Net++, Tiramisu, and DeepLabv3+ as latest instances of advanced families of segmentation models; and propose PPU-Net, a novel light-weight alternative. The deeper architectures outperformed standard U-Net and results from previous studies on the challenging brightfield images, with balanced pixel-wise accuracies of up to 86%. PPU-Net achieved this performance with 20-fold fewer parameters than the comparably accurate methods. All models perform better on larger nuclei and in sparser images. We further confirmed that in the absence of plentiful training data, augmentation and pretraining on other data improve performance. In particular, using only 16 images with data augmentation is enough to achieve a pixel-wise F1 score that is within 5% of the one achieved with a full data set for all models. The remaining segmentation errors are mainly due to missed nuclei in dense regions, overlapping cells, and imaging artifacts, indicating the major outstanding challenges.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopyNeural Networks, ComputerCell NucleusReproducibility of Resultsbrightfield microscopycytometrydeep learningimage analysis

Identifiers

PMID34167359
PMCPMC8458686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.