ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2021
Accelerated multi-target chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance imaging of the mouse heart.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ungated, plug-and-play preclinical cardiac CEST-MRI using radial FLASH with segmented saturation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Imaging of adeno-associated viral capsids for purposes of gene editing using CEST NMR/MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Noninvasively differentiating acute and chronic nephropathies via multiparametric urea-CEST, nuclear Overhauser enhancement-CEST, and quantitative magnetization transfer MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac chemical exchange saturation transfer-magnetic resonance imaging (CEST-MRI) has been used to probe levels of various metabolites that provide insight into myocardial structure and function. However, imaging of the heart using CEST-MRI is prolonged by the need to repeatedly acquire multiple images for a full Z-spectrum and to perform saturation and acquisition around cardiac and respiratory cycles. Compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction of sparse data enables accelerated acquisition, but reconstruction artifacts may bias subsequently derived measures of CEST contrast. In this study, we examine the impact of CS reconstruction of increasingly under-sampled cardiac CEST-MRI data on subsequent CEST contrasts of amine-containing metabolites and amide-containing proteins. Cardiac CEST-MRI data sets were acquired in six mice using low and high RF saturation for single and dual contrast generation, respectively. CEST-weighted images were reconstructed using CS methods at 2-5× levels of under-sampling. CEST contrasts were derived from corresponding Z-spectra and the impact of accelerated imaging on accuracy was assessed via analysis of variance. CS reconstruction preserved myocardial signal to noise ratio as compared to conventional reconstruction. However, greater absolute error and distribution of derived contrasts was observed with increasing acceleration factors. The results from this study indicate that acquisition of radial cardiac CEST-MRI data can be modestly, but meaningfully, accelerated via CS reconstructions with little error in CEST contrast quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.