Trial reportContraception2021
Rates of pregnancy among levonorgestrel and copper intrauterine emergency contraception initiators: Implications for backup contraception recommendations.
Trial report in Contraception, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study assessed the timing, frequency, use of backup method and 1-month pregnancy rates among individuals who had an intrauterine device (IUD) placed as emergency contraception and reported intercourse within 7 days post-placement. STUDY
designIn this secondary analysis of a randomized control trial of IUDs for emergency contraception, 518 individuals reporting unprotected intercourse in the preceding 5 days had a 52 mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system (IUS) or 380 mm
resultsRapid return to sexual activity was common and use of backup contraception was rare, regardless of type of IUD placed. Of participants who resumed penile-vaginal intercourse in the first month, most (286/446, 64.1%) participants reported intercourse within 7 days of IUD placement; only 16.4% (74/446) used condoms or withdrawal. No pregnancies occurred among users of the levonorgestrel IUS who reported intercourse within 7 days of placement (0/138, 0.0%, 95% CI 0.0%, 2.6%) nor among users of the 380mm
conclusionPregnancy rates are low after placement of an IUD for emergency contraception, even among the many who resume intercourse within days following IUD placement without use of backup contraception. IMPLICATIONS: Clinical guidelines should facilitate access to contraception, including elimination of unnecessary recommendations for backup contraception or abstinence in the 7 days following 52 mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.