Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34166562›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2021

Growth resistance and resilience of mixed silver fir and Norway spruce forests in central Europe: Contrasting responses to mild and severe droughts.

Alessandra Bottero, David I Forrester, Maxime Cailleret, Ulrich Kohnle, Arthur Gessler, Dominic Michel, Arun K Bose, Jürgen Bauhus, Harald Bugmann, Matthias Cuntz and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biogeography of Fungal Communities Associated withJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Tree-ring evidence of ecological stress memory.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Alessandra BotteroSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0410-2675
David I ForresterSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4546-3554
Maxime CailleretSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6561-1943
Ulrich KohnleForest Research Institute of Baden-Württemberg FVA, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0824-7409
Arthur GesslerSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1910-9589
Dominic MichelIT Services Group, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5376-9572
Arun K BoseSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8581-1651
Jürgen BauhusChair of Silviculture, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9673-4986
Harald BugmannSwissForestLab, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4233-0094
Matthias CuntzUniversité de Lorraine, AgroParisTech, INRAE, UMR Silva, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5966-1829
Loïc GillerotSwissForestLab, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0699-4478
Marc HanewinkelChair of Forestry Economics and Forest Planning, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4081-6621
Mathieu LévesqueSwissForestLab, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0273-510X
James RyderUniversité de Lorraine, AgroParisTech, INRAE, UMR Silva, Nancy, France.
Julien Sainte-MarieUniversité de Lorraine, AgroParisTech, INRAE, UMR Silva, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8108-3519
Julia SchwarzChair of Silviculture, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2610-3588
Rasoul YousefpourChair of Forestry Economics and Forest Planning, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3604-8279
Juan Carlos Zamora-PereiraChair of Forestry Economics and Forest Planning, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0771-1334
Andreas RiglingSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1944-4042

Funding

ANR ANR-11-LABX-0002-01European Union 606803Federal Ministry for Food and Agriculture 2816ERA04SFederal Office for the Environment 05.0602.PZ/P382-0487ForRISK projectFrench National Research Agency ANR-16-SUMF-0001-01Swiss National Science Foundation 310030_189109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extreme droughts are expected to increase in frequency and severity in many regions of the world, threatening multiple ecosystem services provided by forests. Effective strategies to adapt forests to such droughts require comprehensive information on the effects and importance of the factors influencing forest resistance and resilience. We used a unique combination of inventory and dendrochronological data from a long-term (>30 years) silvicultural experiment in mixed silver fir and Norway spruce mountain forests along a temperature and precipitation gradient in southwestern Germany. We aimed at examining the mechanisms and forest stand characteristics underpinning the resistance and resilience to past mild and severe droughts. We found that (i) fir benefited from mild droughts and showed higher resistance (i.e., lower growth loss during drought) and resilience (i.e., faster return to pre-drought growth levels) than spruce to all droughts; (ii) species identity determined mild drought responses while species interactions and management-related factors strongly influenced the responses to severe droughts; (iii) intraspecific and interspecific interactions had contrasting effects on the two species, with spruce being less resistant to severe droughts when exposed to interaction with fir and beech; (iv) higher values of residual stand basal area following thinning were associated with lower resistance and resilience to severe droughts; and (v) larger trees were resilient to mild drought events but highly vulnerable to severe droughts. Our study provides an analytical approach for examining the effects of different factors on individual tree- and stand-level drought response. The forests investigated here were to a certain extent resilient to mild droughts, and even benefited from such conditions, but were strongly affected by severe droughts. Lastly, negative effects of severe droughts can be reduced through modifying species composition, tree size distribution and stand density in mixed silver fir-Norway spruce forests.

Indexed as

DroughtsEcosystemClimate ChangeEuropeForestsNorwayAbies albaadaptation strategiesclimate changeforest managementinventory dataPicea abiesspecies interactiontree rings

Identifiers

PMID34166562
PMCPMC8453522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.