Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34166394›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents-A systematic review.

Abdelkhalek Samy Abdelkhalek, Haroun Ali Youssef, Ahmed Sayed Saleh, Peter Bollen, Peter Zvara

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Effects of opioids and benzodiazepines on bladder function of awake restrained mice.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdelkhalek Samy AbdelkhalekBiomedical Laboratory, Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7847-0104
Haroun Ali YoussefDepartment of Surgery, Anesthesiology & Radiology, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Ahmed Sayed SalehDepartment of Surgery, Anesthesiology & Radiology, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Peter BollenBiomedical Laboratory, Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Peter ZvaraBiomedical Laboratory, Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKAssiut University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urodynamic studies in rats and mice are broadly used to examine pathomechnisms of disease and identify and test therapeutic targets. This review aims to highlight the effects of the anesthetics on the lower urinary tract function and seeks to identify protocols that allow recovery from anesthesia and repeated measurements while preserving the function which is being studied. All studies published in English language, which compared the data obtained under various types of anesthesia and the urodynamics performed in awake animals were included. It appears that urethane, an anesthetic recommended extensively for the investigation of lower urinary tract function, is appropriate for acute urodynamic studies only. Major advantages of urethane are its stability and ability to preserve the micturition reflex. Due to its toxicity and carcinogenicity, urethane anesthesia should not be used for recovery procedures. This review evaluated available alternatives including propofol, isoflurane and combinations of urethane, ketamine/xylazine, ketamine/medetomidine, and/or fentanyl/fluanisone/midazolam. Different effects have been demonstrated among these drugs on the urinary bladder, the urethral sphincter, as well as on their neuroregulation. The lowest incidence of adverse effects was observed with the use of a combination of ketamine and xylazine. Although the variations in the reviewed study protocols represent a limitation, we believe that this summary will help in standardizing and optimizing future experiments.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnestheticsAnimalsMiceRatsReflexUrinary BladderUrinationUrodynamicsAnesthetics

Identifiers

PMID34166394
PMCPMC8224928
OpenAlexW3176129861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.