ArticlePLoS computational biology2021
Identifying the combinatorial control of signal-dependent transcription factors.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probing transcription factor subsets in gene regulatory networks.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2026Article
- LogicSR: prior-guided symbolic regression for gene regulatory network inference from single-cell transcriptomics data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- NF-κB: master regulator of cellular responses in health and disease.Immunity & inflammation · 2025Review
- Single-cell stimulus-response gene expression trajectories reveal the stimulus specificities of dynamic responses by single macrophages.Molecular cell · 2024Article
- Dynamical and combinatorial coding by MAPK p38 and NFκB in the inflammatory response of macrophages.Molecular systems biology · 2024Article
- The Blueprint of Logical Decisions in a NF-κB Signaling System.ACS omega · 2024Article
- A stimulus-contingent positive feedback loop enables IFN-β dose-dependent activation of pro-inflammatory genes.Molecular systems biology · 2023Article
- Quantifying stimulus-response specificity to probe the functional state of macrophages.Cell systems · 2023Article
- Computational analysis of synergism in small networks with different logic.Journal of biological physics · 2023Article
- Identification and verification of m7G-Related genes as biomarkers for prognosis of sarcoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- What Makes a Functional Gene Regulatory Network? A Circuit Motif Analysis.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022Article
- Kinetics of mRNA nuclear export regulate innate immune response gene expression.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Functional Hallmarks of Healthy Macrophage Responses: Their Regulatory Basis and Disease Relevance.Annual review of immunology · 2022Review
- NEAT1/MALAT1/XIST/PKD--Hsa-Mir-101-3p--DLGAP5 Axis as a Novel Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker Associated With Immune Cell Infiltration in Bladder Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Molecular subtyping of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by large-scale transcriptional profiling: Characterization, therapeutic targets, and prognostic value.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Diversity of synaptic protein complexes as a function of the abundance of their constituent proteins: A modeling approach.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Clipper: p-value-free FDR control on high-throughput data from two conditions.Genome biology · 2021Article
- A Prognostic Autophagy-Related Gene Pair Signature and Small-Molecule Drugs for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Identification and Validation of Potential Candidate Genes of Colorectal Cancer in Response toFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The effectiveness of immune responses depends on the precision of stimulus-responsive gene expression programs. Cells specify which genes to express by activating stimulus-specific combinations of stimulus-induced transcription factors (TFs). Their activities are decoded by a gene regulatory strategy (GRS) associated with each response gene. Here, we examined whether the GRSs of target genes may be inferred from stimulus-response (input-output) datasets, which remains an unresolved model-identifiability challenge. We developed a mechanistic modeling framework and computational workflow to determine the identifiability of all possible combinations of synergistic (AND) or non-synergistic (OR) GRSs involving three transcription factors. Considering different sets of perturbations for stimulus-response studies, we found that two thirds of GRSs are easily distinguishable but that substantially more quantitative data is required to distinguish the remaining third. To enhance the accuracy of the inference with timecourse experimental data, we developed an advanced error model that avoids error overestimates by distinguishing between value and temporal error. Incorporating this error model into a Bayesian framework, we show that GRS models can be identified for individual genes by considering multiple datasets. Our analysis rationalizes the allocation of experimental resources by identifying most informative TF stimulation conditions. Applying this computational workflow to experimental data of immune response genes in macrophages, we found that a much greater fraction of genes are combinatorially controlled than previously reported by considering compensation among transcription factors. Specifically, we revealed that a group of known NFκB target genes may also be regulated by IRF3, which is supported by chromatin immuno-precipitation analysis. Our study provides a computational workflow for designing and interpreting stimulus-response gene expression studies to identify underlying gene regulatory strategies and further a mechanistic understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.