Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34166045›Full record

ArticlePsychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy2022

Scoring the Life Events Checklist: Comparison of three scoring methods.

Carissa N Weis, E Kate Webb, Sarah K Stevens, Christine L Larson, Terri A deRoon-Cassini

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carissa N WeisDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-9199-8632
E Kate WebbDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-4993-7836
Sarah K StevensDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0003-1461-2860
Christine L LarsonDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-1359-6080
Terri A deRoon-CassiniDepartment of Surgery.ORCID 0000-0002-9485-0625

Funding

ABCD-USA Consortium: UWM SIte U01DA041025 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE · PI Christine L Larson, Krista Maurine Lisdahl · 2017 to 2026
$11.2M
J. NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001437 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI THOMAS, DANNY GEORGE · 2015 to 2024
$3.7M
Acute Neurocognitive-affective Predictors of Chronic Post-trauma OutcomesR01MH106574 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE · PI LARSON, CHRISTINE L · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
Medical College of WisconsinNational Institutes of Health; National Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001437NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041025NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrior trauma history is a reliable and robust risk predictor for PTSD development. Obtaining an accurate measurement of prior trauma history is critical in research of trauma-related outcomes. The Life Events Checklist (LEC) is a widely used self-report measure of trauma history that categorizes events by the proximity to trauma exposure; however, the field has published multiple scoring methods when assessing the LEC. Herein, we propose a novel scoring procedure in which total scores from the LEC are weighted according to the proximity of trauma exposure with "experienced" events weighted most and "learned about" events weighted least.

methodThe utility of this weighted score was assessed in two traumatically-injured civilian samples and compared against previously published scoring methods, including a nonweighted score including all events experienced, witnessed, and learned about, as well as a score consisting of only experienced events.

resultsResults indicated the standard total score was most reliable, followed by the weighted score. The experienced events score was least reliable, but the best predictor of future PTSD symptoms.

conclusionsOne method to balance the predictive strength of experienced events and the excellent reliability of a total LEC score, is to adopt the newly proposed weighted score. Future use of this weighted scoring method can provide a comprehensive estimate of lifetime trauma exposure while still emphasizing the direct proximity of experienced events compared with other degrees of exposure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

ChecklistStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticHumansReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID34166045
PMCPMC8702580
OpenAlexW3176119912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.