Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34165709›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

GENCODE Pseudogenes.

Cristina Sisu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cristina SisuDepartment of Life Sciences, College of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK. Cristina.Sisu@brunel.ac.uk.
Brunel University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudogenes have long been considered nonfunctional elements. The influx of large-scale sequencing projects over the last decade have provided rich sources of evidence that pseudogenes can play key evolutionary and regulatory roles, highlighting the need for high quality annotation for both human and key model organisms. To date, GENCODE has completed the manual annotation of pseudogenes in human and has undertaken the task to curate and characterize pseudogenes in the mouse reference genome. Capitalizing on available high-quality annotations as well as on the functional-genomics, evolutionary, and phenotypical data, we were able to create a comprehensive picture of both the human and mouse pseudogene complements' creation, development, and activity. Thus, we found that while human pseudogenes were created through a single burst of retrotransposition events, the active transposable element content in mouse allows for a continuous renewal of the pseudogene pool. Despite their differences, the two organisms share a number of similarities in terms of pseudogene activity, with ~10% of pseudogenes being transcribed. Finally, we highlight a variety of resources developed based on the available GENCODE annotations that help shed light on pseudogene biology.

Indexed as

AnimalsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticEvolution, MolecularGenomicsHumansMiceMolecular Sequence AnnotationPseudogenesRetroelementsSequence Analysis, DNATranscription, GeneticRetroelementsFunctional genomicsGENCODEHumanMousePseudogene

Identifiers

PMID34165709
OpenAlexW4250312476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.