ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021
GENCODE Pseudogenes.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Genomic Fossils to Functional Elements: The Evolving Story of Pseudogenes.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Coding, or non-coding, that is the question.Cell research · 2024Review
- Loss to gain: pseudogenes in microorganisms, focusing on eubacteria, and their biological significance.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Molecular assessment of splicing variants in a cohort of patients with inborn errors of immunity: methodological approach and interpretation remarks.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pseudogenes have long been considered nonfunctional elements. The influx of large-scale sequencing projects over the last decade have provided rich sources of evidence that pseudogenes can play key evolutionary and regulatory roles, highlighting the need for high quality annotation for both human and key model organisms. To date, GENCODE has completed the manual annotation of pseudogenes in human and has undertaken the task to curate and characterize pseudogenes in the mouse reference genome. Capitalizing on available high-quality annotations as well as on the functional-genomics, evolutionary, and phenotypical data, we were able to create a comprehensive picture of both the human and mouse pseudogene complements' creation, development, and activity. Thus, we found that while human pseudogenes were created through a single burst of retrotransposition events, the active transposable element content in mouse allows for a continuous renewal of the pseudogene pool. Despite their differences, the two organisms share a number of similarities in terms of pseudogene activity, with ~10% of pseudogenes being transcribed. Finally, we highlight a variety of resources developed based on the available GENCODE annotations that help shed light on pseudogene biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.