Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34165633›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2022

Validity of a patient-specific percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) simulated surgical rehearsal platform: impact on patient and surgical outcomes.

Ahmed Ghazi, Rachel Melnyk, Shamroz Farooq, Adrian Bell, Tyler Holler, Patrick Saba, Jean Joseph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. [Innovative training concepts in urology].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmed GhaziSimulation Innovation Lab, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA. ahmed_ghazi@urmc.rochester.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4325-1446
Rachel MelnykSimulation Innovation Lab, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
Shamroz FarooqUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
Adrian BellSimulation Innovation Lab, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
Tyler HollerSimulation Innovation Lab, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
Patrick SabaSimulation Innovation Lab, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
Jean JosephDepartment of Urology, Simulation Innovation Lab, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.

Funding

Development and validation of high fidelity, patient specific, kidney phantoms for surgical rehearsalsR03EB027300 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GHAZI, AHMED · 2020 to 2021
$154k
NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB027300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSimulators provide a safe method for improving surgical skills without the associated patient risks. Advances in rapid prototyping technology have permitted the reconstruction of patient imaging into patient-specific surgical simulations that require advanced expertise, potentially continuing the learning curve.

objectivesTo evaluate the impact of preoperative high-fidelity patient-specific percutaneous nephrolithotomy hydrogel simulations on surgical and patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween 2016 and 2017, a fellowship-trained endourologist performed 20 consecutive percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures at an academic referral center. For the first ten patients, only standard review of patient imaging was completed. For the next ten patients, patient imaging was utilized to fabricate patient-specific models including pelvicalyceal system, kidney, stone, and relevant adjacent structures from hydrogel. The models were tested to confirm anatomic accuracy and material properties similar to live tissue. Full procedural rehearsals were completed 24-48 h before the real case. Surgical metrics and patient outcomes from both groups (rehearsal vs. standard) were compared.

resultsSignificant improvements in mean fluoroscopy time, percutaneous needle access attempts, complications, and additional procedures were significantly lower in the rehearsal group (184.8 vs. 365.7 s, p < 0.001; 1.9 vs. 3.6 attempts, p < 0.001; 1 vs. 5, p < 0.001; and 1 vs. 5, p < 0.001, respectively). There were no differences in stone free rates, mean patient age, body mass index, or stone size between the two groups.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that patient-specific procedural rehearsal is effective reducing the experience curve for a complex endourological procedure, resulting in improved surgical performance and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousNephrostomy, PercutaneousFluoroscopyHumansKidneyTreatment OutcomeHigh fidelity simulation trainingLearning curvePatient-specificPercutaneous nephrolithotomyPreoperative surgical rehearsalThree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID34165633
PMCPMC9796494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.